Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    calgary.general    |    A very nice Canuck city, no libtard BS    |    176,774 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 175,229 of 176,774    |
|    =?UTF-8?B?e35ffn3QoNCw0LjRgdCw?= <" to All    |
|    Send your bitumen to China by 'Air Tarsa    |
|    14 Jun 14 16:30:12    |
      XPost: bc.politics, ab.politics, can.politics       XPost: edm.general       From: "@nyet.ca              We don't want your steenkin' oil pipelines or their customers, the       Chinese tankers, plying our west coast waters.       Too bad you're land-locked with the stuff, eh?       ________________________________________________________              Wildrose Leader Danielle Smith pitches national energy corridor in       Vancouver speech                     By Mariam Ibrahim, Edmonton JournalJune 13, 2014                            EDMONTON - Wildrose Leader Danielle Smith says the solution to Alberta’s       energy market access problems is a single, dedicated industrial corridor       that would start in Northern Ontario, cross the northern Prairies and       end at the West Coast.              In a speech to a Vancouver business crowd Thursday, Smith said the time       has come for a national discussion on a market access strategy that       considers a single, multi-use transportation, utility and commercial       corridor, where industry would not only be permitted, but encouraged.              “Rather than have industry come up with a multitude of ideas, proposals       and routes that would ultimately wind up in a series of endless       hearings, politicians would take the lead and settle as many issues as       possible in advance,” Smith told the $89 per plate luncheon organized by       Vancouver-based Curious Mind Productions, which has previously hosted       such high-profile speakers such as U.S. politician Ron Paul and       journalist Rex Murphy.              The corridor would cut through northwestern Canada, from Northern       Ontario through Manitoba to the West Coast. One dedicated route would       eliminate the need for separate regulatory process for each new proposed       project, provided the corridor is wide enough, said Smith, proposing a       kilometre-wide corridor.              “There’s been a new kind of grassroots activism that is making it nearly       impossible to get through the regulatory process,” Smith said in an       interview following her speech. “However, what I’ve also seen is that       those projects that are proposed on existing rights of way seem to have       a much easier time (and) greater public acceptance. If it’s this hard to       get these projects approved now, imagine how hard it’s going to be       decades from now.”              Smith, who told the audience she plans on becoming Alberta’s premier,       acknowledged the plan would be complicated. If past project proposals       are any indication, the idea would face widespread opposition from       environmentalists and First Nations communities.              The federal government is due next week to deliver its final decision on       Enbridge’s Northern Gateway pipeline, which would ship bitumen from       Alberta’s oilsands to Kitimat, B.C. The controversial $6.5-billion       project, given a conditional go-ahead by the National Energy Board’s       joint review panel in December, has been fraught with delays and massive       resistance in B.C., especially among coastal B.C. First Nations worried       about the harmful effects of a spill.              “For two adjacent provinces in the same country that are for the most       part in the same business — primary resource development — the       divergence of views between our two provinces is striking,” Smith told       the audience.              The B.C. Liberal government remains opposed to the Northern Gateway       project and has set out five conditions for the approval of an oil       pipeline through its jurisdiction. One of those conditions — that B.C.       receive its “fair share” of economic benefits, triggered a famously       frosty relationship between then-premier Alison Redford and B.C. Premier       Christy Clark.              The relationship improved and last fall both signed off on an       interprovincial working group report, putting forward 20 recommendations       to pave the way for an enhanced energy partnership between the two provinces              The deal also saw B.C. sign on to Redford’s Canadian Energy Strategy,       which, while short on details, had been described as an attempt to get       the provinces working together to develop resources and access new markets.              Energy Minister Diana McQueen said Alberta has long been working with       the provinces and federal government on a national strategy.              “It’s nice to see the Wildrose is finally showing up to the game, but       we’ve been doing a lot of work on this and ... are making very good       headway on these projects,” McQueen said in an interview.              A solution for the country’s market access needs won’t be “one size fits       all,” she said.              “It’s a lot of work that we’ve been continuing to do and we’re starting       to make very good headway with regards to how we as provinces and       territories showcase Canada as a global energy supplier and. support       each other.”              Smith noted her idea for a single corridor would require leadership from       federal government to negotiate with First Nations communities that may       have land claims over a potential route.              “The federal government would almost certainly have to do the heavy       lifting because the bulk of the negotiations would have to involve       agreement and buy in from our First Nations as a starting point,” she       said. “It would deal with river crossings and protecting environmentally       sensitive habitat. It would not be for the faint of heart or weak in       spirit.”              Any potential route would fall in areas least likely to evoke       opposition, Smith added.              “Nobody lives there? Perfect. That’s where it will go,” she said. “And       once it exists and is clearly defined, people who don’t want anything       industrial occurring in their neighbourhood ... would know where not to       live. Or if they want a good paying job, they would know exactly where       to move.”              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca