Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    calgary.general    |    A very nice Canuck city, no libtard BS    |    176,774 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 175,372 of 176,774    |
|    =?UTF-8?B?IijgsqBf4LKgKSAi?= to All    |
|    Uh, oh - is your Alberta Liberal guy in     |
|    11 Nov 14 17:21:12    |
      XPost: can.politics, edm.general, ab.politics       XPost: ont.politics       From: Panca@nyet.ca              Just a little TOO close to being a rightwing conservative in his habits?       _________________________________________________       Calgary Herald - November 10, 2014                     Elections watchdog called on to investigate donations by Liberal Leader Raj       Sherman                     EDMONTON — Elections Alberta has been asked to investigate political       contributions Liberal Leader Raj Sherman made to his own party in possible       violation of the provincial elections laws.              Documents obtained by the Herald suggest Sherman exceeded the $15,000 limit for       donations three times in the past four years and donated double the limit this       year through corporations he controls, but Sherman says the rules are       “fuzzy”       and if he broke any, it wasn’t done deliberately.              The donations were brought to the attention of Alberta’s chief electoral       officer Glen Resler on Thursday by researcher Tony Clark, a former NDP staff       member with an interest in provincial politics.              Clark said disclosure statements posted on the Elections Alberta website this       year show Sherman made $15,000 donations to his party through the Rajnish       Sherman Professional Corp. and Empress Group Ltd.              Corporate registry documents show Sherman is the lone shareholder of both       corporations.              Under the provincial legislation, two corporations controlled by one person       count as a single entity for election donation purposes.              However, if a donation was made on or after Sept. 29 during the 2014 byelection       campaign, it would not exceed the limit because the limit doubles during       election campaign periods.              Sherman said Friday he doesn’t believe he has violated the Alberta Election       Financing and Contributions Disclosure Act.              “I, as an individual, haven’t exceeded anything and neither have any of the       corporations,” he said. “These are separate donations from separate       entities.       As far as I am aware, under the law I can do that.”              Sherman, who still works shifts as an emergency room doctor, said the       professional corporation was established for his medical practice and the       Empress Group is his investment holding company.              He said he was advised by Elections Alberta on Friday that the 2014 donation,       if it is found to exceed the limit, can be returned without penalty since the       year has not ended and the final results have not yet been filed.              Clark also found disclosure documents that suggest Sherman made a total of       $46,000 in donations to the Alberta Liberal Party through the Empress Group       since 2011, exceeding the donation limit by $4,000 in 2012 and $2,000 in 2011.              Elections Alberta said it will look into the complaint to determine whether an       investigation is warranted, but spokesman Drew Westwater said Sunday it can’t       prosecute offences that occurred in 2011 because there is a three-year statute       of limitations.              “We can’t administer an administrative penalty or prosecute them if it’s       more       three years old, but we can look into them and request they return the       funds,”       he said.              He also confirmed the Liberal party can return $15,000 of the $30,000 it       received from Sherman this year if the donation is found to exceed the limit.              Sherman said the donations he made in 2012 also fell in an election year so it       isn’t clear whether they exceed the limit.              He said he doesn’t think he violated the rules, but if he did, it was “an       honest mistake.”              “If there is a problem, I would like to rectify it,” Sherman said.              But he was adamant he wouldn’t step down if he is found in violation of the       act.              “As the leader of a political party, I put my money where my mouth is,” he       said. “I am not resigning. I am fully committed to serving Albertans.”              Clark pointed out in his letter to the chief electoral officer that the party       may also have violated the act by accepting the donations.              “It is a violation for a political party to accept a donation if the party       knows or ought to know that the amount would exceed the limit,” he noted in       the       letter.              The researcher, who has previously worked for an Alberta opposition party and       is currently employed by a labour organization, said he conducted the research       on his own and acted independently in filing the complaint.              The maximum penalty for violations proved in court is $10,000, but the chief       electoral officer can proceed with an administrative penalty that would involve       a fine of double the amount the donation exceeded the limit, to a maximum of       $10,000 per contravention.              Chaldeans Mensah, a political studies professor at MacEwan University in       Edmonton, said the situation “spells trouble” for the Alberta Liberals.              “It will be a very difficult period coming up for the Liberal Party because       you       don’t want the leader of your party under any kind of ethical cloud,” he       said.              “Hopefully he is able to come up with a credible explanation … but if the       investigation is undertaken and he is found guilty, his situation as leader       becomes untenable.”              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca