Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    calgary.general    |    A very nice Canuck city, no libtard BS    |    176,774 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 175,661 of 176,774    |
|    Canuck57 to All    |
|    Re: NDP surge after leaders' debate in A    |
|    30 Apr 15 11:58:08    |
      XPost: can.politics, ab.politics, edm.general       XPost: ont.politics, bc.politics       From: Canuck57@nospam.com              On 2015-04-28 6:52 PM, Sharx35 wrote:       >       >       > wrote in message news:qqU%w.33268$pO4.498@fx17.iad...       >       > On 28/04/2015 2:00 PM, M.I.Wakefield wrote:       >> Now imagine how the people of Ontario felt on September 7th, 1990,       >> when they       >> awoke to an NDP majority that received 37.6% of the vote.       >       > Probably about the same as they felt when they found out Harper had won       > a majority       > with only 39.6% of the votes.       > --------------------------------------------------------------       -----------------       >       > We do need to ditch the first-past=the-post balloting system, replacing       > it with some kind of proportional rep. based system, i.e. proportion       > of popular vote that a party gets translates directly into proportionate       > number of seats.       > No one could say that their vote was wasted.              Our whole political system is about the worst par-lam-mentry backwater       system in democracy.              You can't fix it with proportional representation, all you get is more       useless unelected politicians collecting pensions and making law without       getting elected. You want it fixed, need a republican system where the       administration and law are separate groups and the premier/president is       elected independent of the law branch.              A far better fix is to take the first $20 of taxes and vote it towards a       registered political candidate in your riding and make lobby groups and       lobby money outlawed. I say the candidate, and if they belong to a       party, they can voluntarily send money to the party. This gives the       voter and the MLA the clout and not a money bought back room dirty leader.              And you can change your money vote each year you file. No need to wait       4 long years in a case like Redfraud to send a message.              Essentially you are turning the productive taxpayers into the lobby       group and excluding the back room deals.              As the real problem I see is our politicians be they city, provincial or       federal do not really represent us at all, its just show time and       illusions....to get our money for their lobbyists, friends, bailout vote       buying.              Ever notice that except for banks that Ottawa bailouts of uncommon good       corporate-union welfare is almost always a union in the mix? Be it CBC,       GM, Magna, Air Canada, Canada Post, Bombardier and others?              We are a money bought the ballot ruse of democracy.              --       Socialist-statism corruption is a great idea so long as the credit is       good and other people pay for it. When the credit runs out and those       that pay for it leave, they can all share having nothing but       unemployment, debt and discontentment.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca