XPost: can.politics, ab.politics, edm.general   
      
   On 02/05/2015 8:02 AM, simplicity wrote:   
   > Note the contempt she has to the concept of "other peoples money". She   
   believes that she is entitled to the fruits of work of others, or as one libby   
   jerk once said "entitled to her entitlements" - whatever she feels those   
   "entitlements" are at any    
   moment.   
   >   
   > Perfect profile of the nude supporter.   
      
   Note that the simpleton has no concept of what "other peoples' money" means.   
      
   Let's help the simpleton out a bit:   
      
   - when you apply for a bank loan, you're tapping into "other peoples' money"   
   - when you take out a mortgage, you're tapping into "other peoples' money"   
   - when the federal government gives foreign oil companies tax breaks, it's   
   tapping into "other   
   peoples' money" - the taxpayers' - to make up the lost revenue in Ottawa   
   - when corporations pay only 10% in taxes, the provincial government has to   
   "tap into "other   
   peoples' money" to make up the revenue that is needed for healthcare,   
   education, infrastructure and   
   a hundred other service areas   
      
   The "other peoples' money" is always the taxpayers' monies - tapped into   
   because of rightwing   
   policies that protect the rich.   
      
   I'd rather support 'nudes' any day, simpleton . . . . *you* are one of the   
   stupid ones that are   
   intent on protecting the rich and greedy.   
      
   	http://www.okanaganlakebc.ca/images/sayings/ills_of_canada.jpg   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)