Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    calgary.general    |    A very nice Canuck city, no libtard BS    |    176,774 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 176,061 of 176,774    |
|    brewnoser2@gmail.com to All    |
|    =?UTF-8?Q?Why_BC=E2=80=99s_Carbon_Tax_Wo    |
|    01 Apr 19 16:02:14    |
      Why BC’s Carbon Tax Worked              Two shrewd components prevented a ‘Yellow Vest’ backlash here.                     In 2008, the province implemented North America’s first broad-based carbon       tax, proving that it is possible to reduce emissions while growing the       economy. Between 2007 and 2015, provincial real GDP grew more than 17%, while       net emissions declined by 4.       7%.              https://thetyee.ca/Analysis/2019/01/10/Relative-GHG-Emissions-GD       -Population-Size.jpg              These decreases occurred in spite of the fact the province saw slightly higher       annual economic growth than Canada as a whole in the years immediately       following the 2008 financial crisis as well as steady population growth.              It’s important to remember that even a revenue-neutral carbon tax can still       function as a tax increase for a significant emitter of CO2. The government       hasn’t committed to making sure no one pays more in taxes. Only that all       the money generated by        the tax gets returned to the public in one way or another.              Learn from BC              Under a revenue-neutral carbon tax program, those inclined to use cleaner       technologies can reduce their taxes considerably below what others in roughly       the same financial boat are paying.              A low-income person who decides to purchase a car instead of riding his bike       or using mass transit still gets to pocket the quarterly refund payments.                ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^       But unlike his friends who choose cleaner alternative modes of transportation,       his refund payments will go entirely toward offsetting the additional cost of       gasoline instead of groceries, rent, or other necessities.              It’s difficult to imagine citizens from the French countryside invading       Paris to protest quarterly tax credits or reductions in their income taxes       intended to offset a 25¢ per gallon gasoline tax. Even if polls indicated       opposition to the new tax, as        they did initially in B.C., it’s hard to work yourself up into a lather       about it when the government can demonstrate that your overall tax burden       hasn’t really changed. And, in all likelihood, what was at first mild       opposition or ambivalence would        eventually become support once people began to realize the benefits.              The inescapable reality we now face is that whether we tax carbon or not, the       cost of emitting so much of it will only be going up from this point forward.       Whether it’s coastal buildings washing into the sea or houses built near the       edge of a forest        burning to the ground, there’s no avoiding climate change’s toll.              A carbon tax that disincentivizes the use of fossil fuels ultimately benefits       both the environment and people.              Hopefully, from now on national, regional, and local governments will learn       from British Columbia’s example as well as France’s mistakes.                     https://thetyee.ca/Analysis/2019/01/11/BC-Carbon-Tax-Success-Explained/              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca