home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   calgary.general      A very nice Canuck city, no libtard BS      176,774 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 176,069 of 176,774   
   The Doctor to sharx335@hotmail.com   
   Re: Another Alberta Poll   
   09 Apr 19 21:08:42   
   
   XPost: can.politics, ab.politics, edm.general   
   XPost: edm.politics, soc.culture.canada   
   From: doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca   
      
   In article ,   
   Sharx335   wrote:   
   >On 2019-04-09 7:43 a.m., The Doctor wrote:   
   >> In article ,   
   >> M I Wakefield  wrote:   
   >>> UCP 47, NDP 39, Alberta 10, Liberal 2   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >https://globalnews.ca/news/5144960/ucp-ndp-ipsos-global-poll-al   
   erta-election-2019-post-debate/   
   >>>   
   >>> Of the post-debate polls, this is almost an exact match for Leger's, while   
   >>> Mainstreet has the UCP a little higher and the AP a little lower ... Forum   
   >>> is the only one very different numbers.   
   >>>   
   >>> https://newsinteractives.cbc.ca/elections/poll-tracker/alberta/   
   >>>   
   >>> It looks like it's all going to come down to Calgary.   
   >>>   
   >> All being said, the NDP and the UCP are lying about the AP splitting the   
   vote.   
   >>   
   >> I have a nice video for you on that.   
   >   
   >Propaganda, no doubt. In reality, it's no crime to "split" the vote.   
   >That is an insult to anyone   
   >   
   >not voting for a "major" party. What re REALLY need is a form of   
   >modified PROPORTIONAL   
   >   
   >REPRESENTATION.  So, if the Alberta Party (or any other party) got, say,   
   >10% of the provincial wide popular vite, then, damn it,   
   >   
   >they would receive TEN PER cent of the seats in the Legislature. The   
   >modification would be that, say, unless a party got at least   
   >   
   >FIVE per cent of the votes, provincial wide, it would receive NO seats.   
   >The would lessen the problem of so-called splinter parties, like   
   >   
   >in Israel or Italy.   
   >   
   >Of course, under such a system, it might be hard to get absolute power,   
   >i.e. more than 50% of the seats. But is that a bad thing"   
   >   
   >It would force more negotiation, it would lessen the chances of a   
   >premier running amok. On the other hand, look how the BC GReen Party   
   >   
   >is leading the BC NDP around by its nose. So, no perfect answer. BUT,   
   >with PR,  far fewer votes could be considered "wasted".   
   >   
      
   You and I agree that the riding system has to be scrapped/   
   --   
   Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici do   
   tor@@nl2k.ab.ca   
   Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist   
   rising!   
   https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b  Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism   
   Alberta on 16 April 2019, do not vote UCP, FCP nor NDP!   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca