MSGID: 1:153/757.0 e6499b59
REPLY: 1:396/45.29@fidonet f86ba821
TZUTC: -0800
CHARSET: LATIN-1
>>> a re-vaxx.  But additional jabs do not increase the
>>> effectiveness towards 100% at all.
>> I've missed this in my own fact-checking & research. Can you point me in
>> the  right direction to read these studies in situ, please?
> It's coming out in the general media now:

Thanks for the links & headlines.  I al;reasy wasn't taking any more, beyond 
shot #2, that the manufaturere of my shot #1 said should not be given in
their  official monograpgh fort he exact dose I was given, so now I have some
ammo to  use when my health centre calls again to try to schedule me for the
new ones.

They did once, & I said I won't even discuss the matter util after they've 
explained why I was given a second dose contrary to the manufacturer's 
instructions.  She quickly discovered she had other work to do. . .

Oh well; I'm sticking to that -- they need to explain why they did not follow 
the drug monogragh the first time around, potentially endangering my health
in  unknown ways (now I know//thank you)

I'm no conspiry theorist by nature, but it's plain there's nmore going on
than  is made official.  I'm not saying this was caused by any particular
entity, but certainly many are cashing in on it &/or using it as a
smokescreen, to  resurrect previous agendas.

Sorry, entities.  
Not gonna play.  
How about a game of Monopoly instead?

--- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Toy-5
 * Origin: The Rusty MailBox - Penticton, BC Canada (1:153/757)
SEEN-BY: 15/0 105/81 106/201 124/5016 129/305 134/100 153/141 757
SEEN-BY: 153/6809 7715 203/0 221/0 6 229/110 317 426 428 664 700 280/464
SEEN-BY: 280/5003 282/1038 292/854 8125 301/1 310/31 317/3 320/219
SEEN-BY: 322/757 396/45 423/120 712/848 770/1 2320/105 2452/250
PATH: 153/757 280/464 292/854 229/426