Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 388  |
|  August Abolins to Ward Dossche  |
|  eTransfer loophole  |
|  18 Mar 23 22:28:00  |
 MSGID: 1:153/757.21@fidonet 068a7e69 REPLY: 2:292/854 19051e5f PID: OpenXP/5.0.57 (Win32) CHRS: ASCII 1 TZUTC: -0400 Hello Ward! WD> What I intended to say is ... this requires manual WD> intervention, it's a person's job and his/her/its salary WD> is paid by whom/what? That makes banking more expensive. Well.. it's their system, and that's why banks figured out they needed to charge for each and every banking activity to pay for their inefficiencies. I'm surprised they haven't introduced an admission/turnstile fee for walking into a bank akin to attending an arena or concert. I have seen the system that prints the cheque amount on the bottom of each cheque. It's a completely manual process. A human has to compare the amount that is written in words to the amount written as numbers to validate. I had written one cheque as "Fifteen Hundred --98/100" and "$1500.98" once, and it cleared as "$15.98" WD> I haven't used cheques for a payment since ... can't WD> remember. At least 25 years. I would prefer to avoid them too. But some businesses are not setup for 100% electronic payments. Some businesses are offering eTransfer options, which isn't bad. But eTransfer here has a maximum daily limit as well as a maximum monthly limit which would many times be insufficient for all my payments. AA>> Wrt cc cards being re-activated every 6 months - I never heard AA>> of that. Perhaps your source of information is outdated. WD> My source of information is pretty current. Ok.. but in Canada there is no 6-month renewal process. Credit cards simply expire on the date that is printed on the card - and often that is many years into the future. WD> When I travel to the US (not Canada) my first transaction WD> needs to be through a bank-ATM to verify my presence in WD> the country. If I go eg to an airport-diner without WD> passing via an ATM first, the transaction will decline. That's your bank's requirement then. But what's stopping a thief to go to the ATM instead of you? If they succeed at the ATM, the card will be "verified". It doesn't prove it was you. -- ../|ug --- OpenXP 5.0.57 * Origin: Stare into this point intently ->.<- (1:153/757.21) SEEN-BY: 15/0 105/81 106/201 124/5016 129/305 134/100 153/0 141 143 SEEN-BY: 153/149 757 6809 7715 203/0 218/840 220/70 221/0 6 226/17 SEEN-BY: 226/30 227/114 229/110 111 112 113 275 307 317 426 428 470 SEEN-BY: 229/664 700 240/1120 250/8 267/800 280/464 5003 282/1038 SEEN-BY: 292/854 8125 301/1 310/31 317/3 320/219 322/757 341/66 234 SEEN-BY: 396/45 423/120 633/280 712/848 770/1 100 340 772/210 220 SEEN-BY: 772/230 2320/105 3634/24 PATH: 153/757 280/464 770/1 317/3 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]