Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 825  |
|  August Abolins to Rob Mccart  |
|  the offline way..  |
|  26 Aug 25 22:11:00  |
 MSGID: 1:153/757.21@fidonet 23cfe530 REPLY: 822.canada@1:2320/105 2d12f3d6 PID: OpenXP/5.0.64 (Win32) CHRS: ASCII 1 TZUTC: -0400 Hello Rob! ** On Tuesday 26.08.25 - 08:46, you wrote to me: RM> Maybe as the Big Social sites get less popular they will RM> make a bit of a comeback. Yeah.. the current popular social sites are not really designed for dialog. They mostly seem to attract posts, rants, shares, #tags. But apps like Sess, Telegram, Briar, and SimpleX would be smarter systems to use. They all purport to support privacy. Whereas, fidonet/othernets/FTN, BBSing messages ..are all in- the-clear now. In the past, echomail was pretty much "secure" in the sense that content wasn't tracked. Echomail exchanges were direct between two systems via a phone call connection. But now with many BBSes opening up their message areas to the internet and any website visitor, the messages are tracked easily and stored for data-eternity. I don't think this form of messaging would gain a significant following to be considered a revived or preferred system. People are leaning towards using their smartphones for "messaging". Except for Aftershock, and the Tg bridge, there really isn't any other easy way to participate in FTN messaging with a phone. RM> [...] Then the Global BBS feeds came out where you could RM> talk to people all over the world and it was amazing at RM> the time. These days that wouldn't mean anything to most RM> people. I was already familiar with a global outreach with Compuserve, and even newsgroups back in the 90s - it seemed amazing to get read and get replies by people from all over the world. Today, a system like Briar can support "groups", so a Briar account can appear to operate like a BBS, albiet the messages are still "chats" - that is, no real sortable Subject - for example - just one long stream of messages. But if people use the "R)eply feature as intended, the messages indent slightly so that you can see which message is related to the parent message. -- ../|ug --- OpenXP 5.0.64 * Origin: Stare into this point intently ->.<- (1:153/757.21) SEEN-BY: 105/81 106/201 124/5016 128/187 129/14 305 134/100 153/0 SEEN-BY: 153/143 148 149 151 153 757 6809 7715 154/30 110 203/0 218/700 SEEN-BY: 221/0 6 226/30 227/114 229/110 275 300 307 317 426 428 470 SEEN-BY: 229/664 700 705 240/1120 280/464 5003 291/111 292/854 8125 SEEN-BY: 301/1 310/31 320/219 322/757 341/66 234 396/45 423/120 460/58 SEEN-BY: 460/256 1124 5858 633/280 712/848 770/1 902/26 2320/105 5015/46 SEEN-BY: 5020/400 8912 5054/30 5075/35 5080/102 PATH: 153/757 280/464 460/58 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]