Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    can.ai    |    Will Canuck AI ask for an AI tax too?    |    4,517 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 3,065 of 4,517    |
|    Michael Heinz to Harlan Osier    |
|    Re: Plutonium really toxic ?    |
|    15 Jul 04 22:04:29    |
      adf0a2b7       XPost: alt.folklore.urban       From: porkchop_d_clown@NOSPAM.mac.com              In article <89ec59b9.0407122137.b247796@posting.google.com>,        maya_egg@hotmail.com (Harlan Osier) wrote:              > I heard that this is just an urban legend and Plutonium is not THAT toxic.       >       > Is that true or will you instantly die after touching Plutonium?              I'm surprised that no one else has mentioned this but, ignoring the       radioactivity (for the moment) plutonium is still a heavy metal and like       lead and other heavy metals does have toxic effects. Like other heavy       metals, it tends to be absorbed by the body and stay there causing long       term problems.              Of course, plutonium *is* radioactive which adds a lot to the effect -       but you still have to ingest it. Depending on how it was absorbed by the       body, it might get lodged in the lungs causing lung cancers or it might       migrate to the bone marrow and cause bone and blood cancers.              But, remember, cancers take many years to form so while a miniscule dose       might kill you in 10 or 15 years, a similarly small amount of botulism       toxin will kill you a lot faster.              In addition, there are many radioactive substances that are much more       radioactive than plutonium - radium, for instance.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca