XPost: alt.horror.cthulhu, alt.evil   
   From: elthiar@verizon.net   
      
   How does believing that Vikings built Stonehenge have anything to do with a   
   Pagan Religion?  Your second paragraph denies your first paragraph.  Which   
   would you like me to comment on?  You forgot to mention the Beaker People   
   that inhabited the British Isles long before the Celts showed up.  If I   
   remember right there was a group of Native Americans that believed that   
   dreams were more important then what they did during the day, because the   
   dream world was real and this one wasn't.  And if you reread my post (which   
   I can't find on this ng any more ???) I never said "we".  So, to quote from   
   one of your posts, "naw naw naw"....   
      
   If you are so 'bent on labeling me, pick one and satisfy yourself.  Not all   
   of us fit in boxes on shelves.  I pity those that do.   
      
      
      
      
   "jeanannd1"  wrote in message   
   news:41054e34_2@127.0.0.1...   
   > Ours, Elithiar, what always gets me about the SO CALLED Pagan religion is   
   > that it's MADE UP.   Which Pagan religion?   So far I've seen people who   
   > have the belief that the Vikings created Stonehenge (talk of lack of   
   > knowledge), that the Vikings, Celts and Picts were all one and the same   
   > (they were not).    That the Roman and Greek Religions were really the   
   same   
   > as the Celtic, Pictish and Norse (that one is really off base) and that   
   it's   
   > really all  in one's mind and the world doesn't exist (this last one from   
   a   
   > strange group of Wiccans).   
   >   
   > So when you say WE, who the heck are you taking about?   Who is we?   
   WHICH   
   > pagan religion (they are and in some cases were REAL, not things to be   
   used   
   > and abused as you choose.)   
   >   
   > Which Pagan religion are you speaking of?   
   >   
   > "Elthiar"  wrote in message   
   > news:Aa8Mc.44105$lz2.14225@nwrddc03.gnilink.net...   
   > > This has got to be the silliest, over-argued, under factually supported   
   > > string I think I have ever read.  Most debates actually have information   
   > > that can be shown.  An interpretive book report on an anti-christian   
   > website   
   > > really doesn't count as a fact.  It is someone's opinion of "how" they   
   > read   
   > > the book.  Also the History channel needs ratings just like any other   
   t.v.   
   > > channel.  As far as Christian apologists go, I don't remember any other   
   > > religion in history being pro Semitic besides Hebrew, so their must be   
   > > apologists out there for every religion including Atheism.  If it's just   
   a   
   > > subtly cloaked antichristian / religion thread....it wasn't very subtle.   
   > >   
   > >   
   > > If I can bring people's attention back to the original post, something   
   > > smells of a "troll".  It seems to have worked.   
   > >   
   > >   
   > > Paganism is alive and well.  Not all of our symbols were absorbed and   
   > > distorted by Christianity or other beliefs.  Just get supporting   
   evidence   
   > > for your arguments.   
   > >   
   > >   
   > > Cheers   
   > >   
   > >   
   > >   
   >   
   >   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)