home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   can.ai      Will Canuck AI ask for an AI tax too?      4,517 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 3,451 of 4,517   
   kathryn to Ridge   
   Re: Star Wars vs. Star Trek   
   28 Aug 04 22:24:03   
   
   XPost: alt.fan.starwars, alt.startrek   
   From: bob@bob.com   
      
   "Ridge"  wrote in message   
   news:3h11j0dvd5vuuljg838821d75qrh4m47lo@4ax.com...   
   > "kathryn"  thus spoke on Sat, 28 Aug 2004 10:20:37 +0000   
   > (UTC):   
   >   
   >   
   > >   
   > >"Harlan Osier"  wrote in message   
   > >news:73640140.0408271539.7ef323ba@posting.google.com...   
   > >> Who would win ???   
   > >   
   > >Depends if Star Wars get to use the Death Star or not, otherwise Id stay   
   > >Trek has superior fire power   
   > >   
   > >Kathryn   
   > >   
   >   
   > "Combat range: in ROTJ, combat initially occurs at ranges of a few   
   > thousands kilometers, eventually closing to a few hundred kilometres   
   > ("point blank" according to Lando) until Rebel ships are within a few   
   > dozen kilometres of the Executor."   
   >   
   >   
   > Main guns: 64000 GW (2 kilotons per shot, 480 rpm firing rate onscreen   
   > in AOTC for time-averaged power output rather than peak output)   
   >   
   >   
   > vs.   
   >   
   > "Combat range: fleet actions in DS9 uniformly feature engagements at   
   > ranges of 5 km or less, just as they do in TNG's Klingon wars or Borg   
   > engagements. In "The Die is Cast", Sisko actually orders the Defiant   
   > to approach to 500 metres (while taking fire) before shooting at a   
   > Jem'Hadar attack ship, presumably due to some disadvantage incurred at   
   > longer range. The only long-ranged incidents involve stationary or   
   > near-stationary targets."   
   >   
   > Main phasers: 3.6 GW   
   >   
   > (http://www.stardestroyer.net/Empire/)   
   >   
   >   
   > Clearly, SW could hammer ST ships at nearly twice the fiirepower for   
   > longer than ST ships could return fire.   
   > --   
   > C.   
   >   
      
      
   Well thank you for that technical reply.   
      
   Did you take into account photon torpedoes?  Superior shielding and the fact   
   that there are more much shinier star trek ships?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca