XPost: alt.fan.starwars, alt.startrek   
   From: starwarsdonotemailmehere@thisismyurl.com   
      
   Anybody  thus spoke on Mon, 30 Aug 2004   
   12:46:14 +1200:   
      
      
   >In article <3in4j05e24u8vu2387dmgi8eeedokenvhk@4ax.com>, Ridge   
   > wrote:   
   >   
   >> Anybody  thus spoke on Mon, 30 Aug 2004   
   >> 09:06:39 +1200:   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> >In article , "Jack"   
   >> > wrote:   
   >> >   
   >> >> >>Who would win ???   
   >> >>   
   >> >> I like both Star Wars and Star Trek. In my option I would say the outcome   
   >> >> would be…   
   >> >>   
   >> >> Either a draw or Star Trek wins.   
   >> >   
   >> >Unless B&B had anything to do with it, in which case Star Trek would   
   >> >lose to even Maggie Simpson (without her gun).   :-(   
   >>   
   >> Well, since B&B got involved ... Star Trek has better babes    
   >   
   >That's because "babes" is all B&B (aka Beavis & Butthead) are   
   >interested in. They're definitely not even remotely interested in   
   >actually making "Star Trek" shows - in fact one of the twits has   
   >reportedly said as much.   
      
   As I've said before, studios have to realize that creating mythos such   
   as SW or ST is a two directional conversation, it's not them dictating   
   to us what we will watch, it's us telling them what we want to watch.   
      
   The only SciFi currently running that takes that into account is   
   probably Stargate ... and that's probably why it's popularity is   
   through the roof while both SW and ST are slipping.   
   --   
   C.   
      
   HVC VENITE PVERI, VT VIRI SITIS   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)