Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    can.ai    |    Will Canuck AI ask for an AI tax too?    |    4,517 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 4,129 of 4,517    |
|    JK to Benjamin Gawert    |
|    Re: Intel creates weak processors !    |
|    14 Sep 04 10:10:00    |
      XPost: comp.sys.intel       From: JK9821@netscape.net              Benjamin Gawert wrote:              > JK wrote:       >       > >> 64Bit for notebooks is just for catching the clueless masses that       > >> run behind high GHz and GByte numbers...       > >       > > There are people who want to run 64 bit software.       >       > Yes, right. There are tons of applications for x86-64 that _require_ to be       > run as 64bit on a notebook. You for sure are one of the people living in the       > belief that 64bit are much faster than 32bit...       >       > Interestingly, AMD64 is mostly found in cheap consumer notebooks. I can't       > think of any business notebook working with an AMD64 CPU. On the other hand,       > there are lots of P-M notebooks which provide unbeaten battery runtime              Look for thin and light Athlon 64 notebooks in the near future. AMD started       shipping the chips for those in August.              >       > (except maybe the PPC-based Apple iBooks/Powerbooks) and a great       > performance...       >       > >>> Is it because they can't manage to make a low power 64 bit       > >>> processor?       > >>       > >> AMD also can't make a low power 64bit processor. MIPS does for       > >> example...       > >>       > >> Benjamin       > >       > > AMD makes some very low power processors.       >       > Right, a 32bit CPU. Intel has lots of them, too...       >       > But AMD still has no real low power 64bit processor...       >       > > AMD also makes some Opteron chips that use only 30 watts, which have       > > the designation EE.       >       > 30Watts are not low power.              Compared to 100+ watt Intel chips they are.              > 3-12 Watts are low power.              3-12 watt 64 bit server chips with integrated memory controllers?       You are dreaming.              > The opteron is a nice       > CPU (even when having some bottlenecks), but certainly not a low power       > CPU...              The 30 watt ones are. Of course they aren't nearly as cheap as the       higher power consuming ones.              >       >       > Benjamin              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca