XPost: talk.origins   
   From: rsn_@_comcast.net   
      
   On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 21:59:21 +0000 (UTC), "Alan Jeffery"   
    wrote:   
      
   >   
   >"r norman"  wrote in message   
   >news:0oodk0d46rf0j0jqng0hr6otngro5qg0mq@4ax.com...   
   >> On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 03:51:16 +0000 (UTC), "Alan Jeffery"   
   >>  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>    
   >>   
   >> >> > > > But notice the Second Law of Talk.Origins:   
   >> >> > > >   
   >> >> > > >       "The lamer the post, the bigger the resulting thread."   
   >> >> > >   
   >> >> > > Impossible! You can't get more information out than was put in   
   >there   
   >> >at   
   >> >> > > the beginning.   
   >> >> >   
   >> >> > Reading for comprehension John.  He said _longer_ not more   
   >informative.   
   >> >> >   
   >> >>   
   >> >> But if it's longer it is more irreducibly complex. Information cannot   
   >be   
   >> >> created (except by an unspecific omnicompetent designer about whom we   
   >> >> cna say nothing).   
   >> >   
   >> >So far I can't see anything even remotely complex in this thread.   
   >> >   
   >>   
   >> Now that the original subject of the thread is completely changed, is   
   >> this an example of sympatric speciation?   
   >>   
   >Please show me the transitional post.   
   >   
      
   If I did, you would just find two new gaps that needed transitional   
   elements!   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)