XPost: talk.origins   
   From: observa_no_spam@xtra.co.nz   
      
   "r norman"  wrote in message   
   news:6k4fk0hd8p62g8bjvrb8shp0gl034au5oq@4ax.com...   
   > On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 21:59:21 +0000 (UTC), "Alan Jeffery"   
   >  wrote:   
   >   
   > >   
   > >"r norman"  wrote in message   
   > >news:0oodk0d46rf0j0jqng0hr6otngro5qg0mq@4ax.com...   
   > >> On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 03:51:16 +0000 (UTC), "Alan Jeffery"   
   > >>  wrote:   
   > >>   
   > >>    
   > >>   
   > >> >> > > > But notice the Second Law of Talk.Origins:   
   > >> >> > > >   
   > >> >> > > >       "The lamer the post, the bigger the resulting thread."   
   > >> >> > >   
   > >> >> > > Impossible! You can't get more information out than was put in   
   > >there   
   > >> >at   
   > >> >> > > the beginning.   
   > >> >> >   
   > >> >> > Reading for comprehension John.  He said _longer_ not more   
   > >informative.   
   > >> >> >   
   > >> >>   
   > >> >> But if it's longer it is more irreducibly complex. Information   
   cannot   
   > >be   
   > >> >> created (except by an unspecific omnicompetent designer about whom   
   we   
   > >> >> cna say nothing).   
   > >> >   
   > >> >So far I can't see anything even remotely complex in this thread.   
   > >> >   
   > >>   
   > >> Now that the original subject of the thread is completely changed, is   
   > >> this an example of sympatric speciation?   
   > >>   
   > >Please show me the transitional post.   
   > >   
   >   
   > If I did, you would just find two new gaps that needed transitional   
   > elements!   
      
   But it would still only be micro-change, not macro.  Silly evilutionist.   
      
   Alan Jeffery   
   >   
      
      
   ---   
   Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.   
   Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).   
   Version: 6.0.754 / Virus Database: 504 - Release Date: 6/09/2004   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)