XPost: talk.origins   
   From: rsn_@_comcast.net   
      
   On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 13:37:34 +0000 (UTC), turnkey4099@hotmail.com   
   (Harry K) wrote:   
      
   >Timberwoof  wrote in message new   
   :...   
   >> In article <2qpotaF117hi2U1@uni-berlin.de>,   
   >>  "Alan Jeffery"  wrote:   
   >>   
   >> > "r norman"  wrote in message   
   >> > news:6k4fk0hd8p62g8bjvrb8shp0gl034au5oq@4ax.com...   
   >> > > On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 21:59:21 +0000 (UTC), "Alan Jeffery"   
   >> > >  wrote:   
   >> > >   
   >> > > >   
   >> > > >"r norman"  wrote in message   
   >> > > >news:0oodk0d46rf0j0jqng0hr6otngro5qg0mq@4ax.com...   
   >> > > >> On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 03:51:16 +0000 (UTC), "Alan Jeffery"   
   >> > > >>  wrote:   
   >> > > >>   
   >> > > >>    
   >> > > >>   
   >> > > >> >> > > > But notice the Second Law of Talk.Origins:   
   >> > > >> >> > > >   
   >> > > >> >> > > >       "The lamer the post, the bigger the resulting thread."   
   >> > > >> >> > >   
   >> > > >> >> > > Impossible! You can't get more information out than was put in   
   >>  there   
   >>  at   
   >> > > >> >> > > the beginning.   
   >> > > >> >> >   
   >> > > >> >> > Reading for comprehension John.  He said _longer_ not more   
   >>  informative.   
   >> > > >> >> >   
   >> > > >> >>   
   >> > > >> >> But if it's longer it is more irreducibly complex. Information   
   >>  cannot   
   >>  be   
   >> > > >> >> created (except by an unspecific omnicompetent designer about whom   
   >>  we   
   >> > > >> >> cna say nothing).   
   >> > > >> >   
   >> > > >> >So far I can't see anything even remotely complex in this thread.   
   >> > > >> >   
   >> > > >>   
   >> > > >> Now that the original subject of the thread is completely changed, is   
   >> > > >> this an example of sympatric speciation?   
   >> > > >>   
   >> > > >Please show me the transitional post.   
   >> > > >   
   >> > >   
   >> > > If I did, you would just find two new gaps that needed transitional   
   >> > > elements!   
   >> >   
   >> > But it would still only be micro-change, not macro.  Silly evilutionist.   
   >>   
   >> Ah, but this evolution must be punctuated!   
   >   
   >Correctly I hope.   
   >   
      
   Commas denote genera, dashes are families, semicolons are orders and   
   colons are phyla.   Run-on sentences are polyphyletic groupings.   
   Sentence fragments are newly discovered mutations still in need of   
   classification.  Parenthetical asides result from horizontal gene   
   transfer.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)