home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   can.aviation      Meh all I know is that Westjet SUCKS      71 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 37 of 71   
   viz to hwang3d1@erau.edu   
   Re: Open Discussion regarding ATC Phrase   
   29 Dec 04 23:18:35   
   
   XPost: aus.aviation, fido.aviation, fido.ger.aviation   
   From: viz@*nospam*.pacific.net.au   
      
   On 28/12/04 6:06 PM, in article mC7Ad.11522$c%.10765@okepread05, "In Soo"   
    wrote:   
      
   > I would like to thank you for clicking on this message.   
   > One of the question that came up to my attention just few days ago was that   
   > what are some of the common phraseologies in aviation that we use that are   
   > non-standard?  Such as using "Cleared for Takeoff"  as "Clear to go",   
   > What are the clearances that you must reply back other than "Hold short?" Is   
   > "Wilco" acceptable term at your airport?   
   > What are some of the clearances that we can say "Roger" and be acceptable?   
   > How about "Wilco" I do understand the FAA meaning of above terms, but what   
   > about you guys? Are there any non-standard phraseologies that you use   
   > everyday in flying and are accepted?   
   >   
   > IN SOo Hwang   
   >   
      
   I think that the only non standard phrase that comes to mind is "Roger". I   
   hear it used when the conversation with ATC goes a little outside   
   parameters, or there is some confusion to clear up.   
      
   Old habits die hard I guess!   
      
      
   /viz   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca