XPost: us.politics, can.politics, alt.military   
   From: dave-no_spam@unixhome.net   
      
   "Tom P"  wrote in message   
   news:OnqMj.65883$y05.59358@newsfe22.lga...   
   > Roy wrote:   
   >>   
   >> Sounds like they are all out to lunch.   
   >> -   
   >   
   > What's wrong with having an independent investigation and having some of   
   > these questions answered?   
      
   Waste of money.   
      
   > Why should we be afraid of the truth?   
      
   The truth is on film and in common off the shelf high school   
   chemistry/physics.  Just that some Muslim fanatics and sensationalists want   
   it viewed differently does not make it any different.   
      
   > This is an event that has changed the course of world history. Every   
   > attempt should be made to remove the cloud of suspicion that lingers over   
   > this event. Trying to ignore these suspicions will only fuel the debate   
   > about cover ups.   
   >   
   > Why should there not be a thorough investigation?   
      
   Because there is no need to.  The building behaved as expected.   
      
   I am sure if I dumped 10,000 gallons of aircraft fuel in one splash around   
   your house and lit it, neither you or your house would have much left in 5   
   minutes but ashes.  Or perhaps hit your house with 164,000 pounds of   
   reinforced aluminium, steal loaded with fuel at 300-400 mph there would not   
   be much left.   
      
   The effect was simple, the planes were in effect very large flying bombs   
   used by cowardly terrorists declaring war on our way of life.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)