f77fc226
XPost: alt.slack
From: steve49152@yahoo.ca.ca
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 02:38:55PM -0800, The Sicker Vicar wrote:
> On Dec 22, 5:06 pm, "Steve Thompson" wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 01:53:24PM -0800, The Sicker Vicar wrote:
> > > On Dec 22, 4:25 pm, "Steve Thompson" wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 08:27:54AM -0800, Rev. Back It On Up 13 wrote:
> >
> > > > > On Dec 21, 8:27 pm, Doktor Gone wrote:
> > > > > > American east coast time
> > > > > > 7pm heavy posting
> > > > > > 8pm - 8:30pm heavy replying and moderate posting
> > > > > > 9pm nothing happens
> > > > > > I assume you americans are watching some "favorit" TV show at this
> > > > > > time...
> > > > > > 11pm picks back up but not the same peak as at 7pm
> > > > > > 12am slows (people get sleepy "gotta go to work")
> > > > > > 1am very slow
> > > > > > 2am like 2 people still replying or posting (singles with out or
> > > > > > married with)
> > > > > > 3am drops out again
> > > > > > 4am nothing
> > > > > > 5am nothing
> >
> > > > > Hello.
> >
> > > > > I am the Big Boss of this general Area, and I have an urgent message
> > > > > for you. It is something that Ivan Stang does not want you to know.
> > > > > Your posession of the forthcoming message and the top secret
> > > > > information contained therein is very threatening to him. I fear
that
> > > > > by supplying you with the critical information, I will be labeled a
> > > > > "rogue" SubGenius and may be expelled from the church as well as
> > > > > receiving threatening messages from Ivan Stang himself along with his
> > > > > usual weekly demands for a percentage of my income and sexual
> > > > > humiliation.
> >
> > > > > If you feel you are ready to receive the top secret message, let me
> > > > > know and I will pass it on to you, AT GREAT PERSONAL RISK.
> >
> > > > Lots of true believers in your part of the world, ain't there.
> >
> > > Dude, save up your pennies and buy a joke from a joke-writer.
> >
> > > And don't hand me that "It's my humorlessness that IS my humor"
> > > nonsense.
> >
> > > And don't try that "you should accept me for my humorless self" bit
> > > either.
> >
> > > Either ENTERTAIN, or shut up and BE ENTERTAINED. EITHER is acceptable.
> >
> > > You're like a gaping hole in Usenet.
> >
> > And whose fault is that?
> >
> > Personally, I would blame television for the implied brain-rot
> > existing among all your buddies but I won't rule out other
> > contributing factors.
>
> Digging further won't help. I'm talking about you. You seem to think
> you're witty. You're not. Grow a comedy gland or SHUT DOWN.
The old wittier-than-thou ploy utterly fails to put a tent in my
trousers. If you feel one must be funny in order to meet your social
and cultural criterion for inclusion in your exquisite circle-jerk,
well I have news for you.
> There is no value whatsoever in what you say. It doesn't entertain,
> provoke thought (except ones of "christ, shut up, you useless clump"),
> inform, or do anything. It doesn't even annoy properly.
I would say it does annoy you greatly, and to a degree that is exactly
appropriate to the situation.
> The problem is, it's really depressing and pathetic to watch you try
> to convince anyone, even just yourself, that there's a reason you
> exist.
As long as I keep repeating the same words and phrases it will be
true. We have no need to entertain further discussion on that plane.
Much more important is an inqury into your unwillingness (some say,
inability) to affect civilized relations with your gross intellectual
superiors.
> There may actually BE a reason for you to be, but it has nothing to do
> with being funny. Most people just accept that. Comedians need
> audiences—and that's where YOU come in.
I'd say that your pathalogical need to hold a gun to your auduence
(lest they look elsewhere for their input) channels indicates the
direction you should consider when you conduct due dilligence
inquiries to your own position and aims. This would involve
reasoning, though, and it is already a matter of public record that
you find reason inconvenient when it risks your position at the
trough.
> It doesn't mean you should NEVER post. When we get around to
> cheeseburger recipes, political opinions, bizarre news of the Pink
> world, whatever--chime right in. But just say something. Don't try to
> be Steven Wright when you're not even Sinbad.
Another round? That would probably be best for all concerned at this
point.
> I think that's how Michael Alcandor got started. Ya wanna end up like
> THAT?
Unwilling and unable to be reasonably intelligent? I fail to see
where my risk comes from in that regard.
Regards,
Steve
--
dumbshit racist brainwashees
so happy with your limitations.
get cancer and die or do
you want to smell my butt?
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
