XPost: alt.usenet.kooks, can.general, can.politics   
   XPost: edm.general, rec.arts.drwho   
   From: bobbylarter@gmail.com   
      
   Ignis Fatuus wrote:   
   > On Sat, 16 May 2009 19:04:37 +1000, Bob Larter    
   > wrote:   
   >   
   >> Sweetness wrote:   
   >>> "Ignis Fatuus"  wrote in message   
   >>> news:d28o0594s5sh64ti3atipmuimifun77jco@4ax.com...   
   >>> : On Thu, 14 May 2009 15:22:34 +1000, Bob Larter   
   >>>    
   >>> : wrote:   
   >>> :   
   >>> : >Meat Plow wrote:   
   >>> : >> On Tue, 12 May 2009 19:11:34 +1000, Bob Larter   
   >>> : >> wrote:   
   >>> : >>   
   >>> : >>> 
sychotic hicken wrote:   
   >>> : >>>> Ignis Fatuus  as King Henry V:  Though   
   >>> all that   
   >>> : >>>> I can do is nothing worth, Since that my penitence comes after   
   >>> all,   
   >>> : >>>> Imploring Pardon.   
   >>> : >>>>> It's now OFFICIAL. Bob Larter has been Nominated for Golden   
   >>> Killfile   
   >>> : >>>>> of the Month and seconded By   
   >>> : >>>>> The Honest One    
   >>> : >>>>> Newsgroups:   
   >>> : >>>>>   
   >>> alt.usenet.kooks,rec.arts.drwho,alt.suicide.holiday,uk.rec.sheds,uk.adve   
   >>> : >>>>> rts.computer   
   >>> : >>>>> Message-ID:    
   >>> : >>>>>   
   >>> : >>>>> Votes by a show of hands before Any Other Business, and we   
   >>> should have   
   >>> : >>>>> him hung out to dry by Tuesday week.   
   >>> : >>>>    
   >>> : >>> Best of luck with that, kid.   
   >>> : >>   
   >>> : >>   
   >>> : >> Bwaaaaaaaaaaahahah who are these fucktards?   
   >>> : >   
   >>> : >Sweetness nominated 
sychotic hicken for an award, so he's   
   >>> been   
   >>> : >trying to recruit folks from ASH & RADW to fuck with AUK. Oh, &   
   >>> he's   
   >>> : >been froging yours truly.   
   >>> :   
   >>> : Of course you had nothing to do with awarding one of ours a golden   
   >>> : killfile because Yads asked you to...   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>> I am pretty sure that Bob Larter has "awarded" nothing ta anybody as   
   >>> FNVW, yet, az he's brand spunkin' new ta the office.   
   >> Ignis was confusing a nomination with an award. Anybody can make a   
   >> nomination, but I (as FNVW) have to validate it for it to actually go on   
   >> the ballot. In this case, the nomination was invalid, so I rejected it.   
   >   
   > Disingenuous. You accepted the nomination  without knowledge of the   
   > individual being nominated, and then dropped it on a technicality. I   
   > just felt that one ought to ask for justification before accepting a   
   > nomination - particularly from a former winner, and in the middle of a   
   > declaration of flame war. It's a matter of judging the 'mood' of the   
   > group.   
      
   Okay, you have a valid point here. All I can say is that being new to   
   the job, I was a little overwhelmed. OTOH, over the next couple of days,   
     various Kookologists pointed out to me that the person making the   
   nomination was a kook, so even without the technical point, I would've   
   rejected the nomination anyway. Also, as you say, anyone nominating   
   someone for an award should provide evidence to back up their   
   nomination. Without that evidence, their nomination would be rejected.   
   In this particular case, it was rejected before any of those issues were   
   brought up.   
      
   --   
       W   
     . | ,. w ,   "Some people are alive only because   
      \|/  \|/     it is illegal to kill them."    Perna condita delenda est   
   ---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)