From: ab.chaplin@yourfinger.rogers.com   
      
   gsfrankieg@yahoo.ca wrote in   
   news:9647d37d-9b38-4aad-b55e-ccaff13716b7@googlegroups.com:   
      
   > On Sunday, December 22, 2002 at 5:13:31 PM UTC-5, Jack wrote:   
   >> Has anyone seen the press on the Gagetown soldier who is running for   
   >> political office? I saw an interview with him this evening and he's   
   >> pushing the envelope to see what the CF will do to him. He will invoke   
   >> the Charter as a defence...should be interesting....l   
   >   
   > I guess I am late to this conversation.  It was resolved without SCM   
   > because the NDA was illegal.  I don't know anything about the Mayor   
   > talking to anyone's CO.  We had 3 members, including myself, as   
   > councillors back then so perhaps it was one of them.  I am now retired   
   > from the CF and living in Florida.   
      
   What aspect of the NDA was "illegal"? QR&O 19.44 looks pretty much the same   
   to me as when I was serving in 2000.   
      
   --   
   Andrew Chaplin   
   SIT MIHI GLADIUS SICUT SANCTO MARTINO   
   (If you're going to e-mail me, you'll have to get "yourfinger." out.)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)