Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    can.general    |    General Canuck chatter    |    162,586 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 160,769 of 162,586    |
|    BumbleBee to Cafe Racer    |
|    Re: Exeter's and BumbleBee's wishful thi    |
|    23 Oct 17 14:05:41    |
      XPost: can.politics, alt.politics.usa       From: cama@ro.tran              On 10/23/2017 1:42 PM, Cafe Racer wrote:       > It is impractical to attempt to bring about a ban on ng posters living       outside the territorial USA posting disapproval or criticism of US life and       politics.              True.              But no "ban" was tenderted, now was it?              Mmm hmm.                     > E and B: citizens more often criticize THEIR OWN governments than they do       other governments. Every google group shows this. US google groups carry       criticism of the US gov't, as well as criticism of many many other nations.        UK groups frequently        criticize nations within the EU, as do US groups.              Sadly what IS definitive is the propensity for the residents of 3 petty       nations to continually hammer on and blame the US (in lieu of their own       nations) for all manner of imagined transgressions or lifestyle and       societal differences which they find too terrible to countenance.              Those nations would be:              The Unfree Kingdom (Englies mainly)              Canuckistan              Asstrailer              We tend not to get guff from other corners of the "developed world" on a        recurring basis, just those 3 countries.              Can I prove it?              Oh HELL yes!              > It's not realistic to hope that people from outside your own country will       not criticize it.              Is it realistic to note how regularly Canucks manage to make us their       whipping post?              Of course it is!              > The same principle holds for every sphere of activity. Roman Catholics       cannot expect to be protected from criticism from other denominations and       religions.              Non sequitur.              Why did you decide to trade topical venues?              Isn't a nation by nation examination a broad enough spectrum to investigate?              > It may ease Exeter and Bumblebee's annoyance if they were to NOT read       Canadian and UK forums.              Yet they are not where this was experienced primarily nor where it would       be much of a concern.              The dominant US political groups is where these servile hypocrites ply       their witless critiques and griping.              We've simply decided to return a measure of the animus home to their own       national groups where you (and they) can fully experience the       accountability that is always lacking in this medium.              Please, do tell us again what a great poster MI Wakefield is, eh?              Fucking A!              And "wy"?              "Dechucka"?              R.KymHorsehead"?              The list goes on and on...              > The same applies to Canadian and UK readers: if susceptible to annoyance,       they should avoid US groups that carry criticisms of the UK and Canada.              Which completely MISSES the point!              We do not spend a boatload of time in THEIR groups ripping THEIR nations       for their inherent or perceived flaws and traits.              Period.              End of equation.              > Fair do's, as they say in some English-speaking countries :-)              Payback's a biotch!              As some wise man who got sick of being blamed unfairly once mused.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca