XPost: can.politics, alt.global-warming   
   From: yo@mack.daddy   
      
   On 10/28/2017 1:13 PM, Dhu on Gate wrote:   
   > On Sat, 28 Oct 2017 12:46:14 -0600, Ultra Magnus wrote:   
   >   
   >>   
   >>> Still no answer.   
   >>   
   >> Rhetorical snowmen are allowed to melt in place.   
   >>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> A clock's pendulum will swing back and forth unaided. That doesn't   
   >>>>> disprove that a human hand can stop its swing, or readjust it, or   
   >>>>> change its amplitude.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Rhetorical snowmen are allowed to melt in place.   
   >>>   
   >>> Now have an adult look up "non sequitur" for you.   
   >>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> No run along and have an adult tell you what "amplitude" means.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> It means almost ZERO in a closed loop system where the dominant heat   
   >>>> input is solar.   
   >>>   
   >>> Nope. There are clearly factors that are affected by man that change the   
   >>> amount of heat the earth RETAINS.   
   >>   
   >> But you will confess the only way to completely change the total heating   
   >> is solar, right?   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_depth/sci_tech/2000/climate_change/1023334.stm   
   >>   
   >> Not our fault   
   >>   
   >> Are we, the fossil-fuel-burning public, partially responsible for this   
   >> recent warming trend? Almost assuredly not.   
   >>   
   >   
   > Alan, you are arguing with someone who plays word games and claims it is   
   "Science".   
   >   
   > Rhetoric =/= Semantics.   
   >   
   > Dhu   
   >   
      
   Facts = word games excuse making.   
      
   You and your AGW ilk just can't stand knowing we're not to blame for   
   living in a closed loop system.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)