Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    can.internet.highspeed    |    Supposed to be for Canuck DSL/cable nets    |    27,972 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 26,064 of 27,972    |
|    Tony to Some Guy    |
|    Re: Changes to Rogers TV analog cable ch    |
|    27 Apr 12 19:17:26    |
      From: Tony@TheDeli.Sandwich              Rogers signal strength on digital is worst than pathetic. I use two       professional broadband boosters from Motorola. I wouldn't even think of       getting Rogers cable internet contrary to their bullshit commercial on tv       the feed into your house is "one" line not two and if you subscribe to both       Rogers digital cable and internet then they both turn to mush.              Some Guy wrote:              > Just got this in the mail today. I'm subscribed to a Rogers analog       > cable service (have been for more than 10 years) so it's understandable       > why I'm getting this letter. I don't know if anyone else that could       > technically be a "digital" cable subscriber is getting these letters...       >       > On the front-side of the letter, it seems to indicate that some or many       > channels are being removed from analog service, and that I'm going to       > need a free digital box (digital adapter) to view them. A date of May       > 31 is given for this change.       >       > On the back side, the reality is somewhat different. It seems that 6       > channels are going to be moved (but remain analog) and 3 are going to be       > removed from the CCTV channel lineup and go completely digital. Here's       > the change:       >       > Channel Current New       >       > W Network 60 70       > Shopping channel 18 95       > Vision TV 27 96       > Treehouse 63 18       > APTN 70 129       > TVA 95 130       > RDI 96 (ATSC only)       > Ontario Legis. 129 (ATSC only)       > TV5 130 (ATSC only)       >       > So, does anyone (or can anyone) speculate why they're playing this shell       > game?       >       > We have APTN(70) being moved to 129, and W Network(60) being moved to       > the channel that APTN used (70). The channel that was on 129 (Ontario       > legislature) being moved to digital.       >       > We have Treehouse(63) being moved to the channel currently being used by       > Shopping channel (18), and Shopping being moved to the channel currently       > being used by TVA (95), and TVA being moved up to 130, and 130 (TV5)       > being moved to digital.       >       > We have Vision TV (27) being moved to the channel currently used by RDI       > (96) and RDI being kicked into digital.       >       > So we have channel 60 and 63 being free'd up, and for the past year or       > two channels 59, 61 and 62 have been empty as well (one or two of those       > were US network affiliates in Cleveland if I remember correctly). That       > would create a block of empty channels from 59 through 63.       >       > There is currently nothing in analog format on channels 64 through 69       > and 71 through 80 - and I suspect that there is something on each of       > those channels being broadcast in scrambled ATSC format. On channels 81       > through 84 there are On-demand and Pay-per-view channels that are       > broadcast in ATSC but they are not scrambled - I've been viewing those       > for maybe a year now directly on my flatscreen TV.       >       > It looks like channel 27 is going to be empty.       >       > Is there a legal case to be made that the removal of the Ontario       > Legislature from analog cable is a violation of CRTC accessibility rules       > or standards?       >       > I see this as a test for Rogers to see how many people that currently do       > not have a digital tuner box will put in a request for the no-frills       > Cisco digital box given the changes being planned. They've clearly       > identified the least-watched channels to eliminate from analog service,       > seemingly with the intent to float this trial balloon to gage the       > reaction.       >       > The letter goes on to say:       >       > "Soon more analog channels will no longer be available for       > viewing without a digital adapter (we'll keep you informed)"       >       > Has Rogers done this (removed POPULAR channels from the analog domain)       > in any other city yet?       >       > I know that Cogeco in Windsor has been removing channels from the analog       > domain for the past few months. There isin't much available above       > channel 27 in analog format at this point).       >       > Comments?              --       The Grandmaster of the CyberFROG              Come get your ticket to CyberFROG city              Nay, Art thou decideth playeth ye simpleton games. *Some* of us know proper       manners              Very few. I used to take calls from *rank* noobs but got fired the first day       on the job for potty mouth,              Bur-ring, i'll get this one: WHAT'S YOUR PROBLEM JERK!!? We're here to help       you dickweed, ok, ok give the power cord the jiggily piggily wiggily all the       while pushing the power button repeatedly now take everything out of your       computer except the power supply and *one* stick of ram. Ok get the next       sucker on the phone.              Deirdre Straughan (Roxio) is a LIAR (Deirdre McFibber)              There's the employer and the employee and the FROGGER and the FROGEE, which       one are you?              Hamster isn't a newsreader it's a mistake!              El-Gonzo Jackson FROGS both me and Chuckcar (I just got EL-FROG-OED!!)              I hate them both, With useless bogus bullshit you need at least *three*       fulltime jobs to afford either one of them              I'm a fulltime text *only* man on usenet now. The rest of the world       downloads the binary files not me i can't afford thousands of dollars a       month              VBB = Volume based billing. How many bytes can we shove down your throat and       out your arse sir?              UBB = User based bullFROGGING              Master Juba was a black man imitating a white man imitating a black man              Using my technical prowess and computer abilities to answer questions beyond       the realm of understandability              Regards Tony... Making usenet better for everyone everyday              This sig file was compiled via my journeys through usenet              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca