Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    can.internet.highspeed    |    Supposed to be for Canuck DSL/cable nets    |    27,972 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 26,172 of 27,972    |
|    Some Guy to JF Mezei    |
|    Re: RIAA gets $675k fine upheld against     |
|    21 May 12 17:40:54    |
      From: Some@Guy.com              JF Mezei wrote:              > Yep. $22,500 for each song he downloaded and shared back in 2004.              A US case, one of the first (apparently).              =======       No one has been successfully sued in Canada for downloading music or       sharing it online. Most forms of music copying for "private use" are       expressly legal under the Copyright Act.       =======              Media reports such as this one throw around terms like "sharing",       "uploading" and "downloading".              Let's be clear here.              He was nailed NOT because of downloading.              He was nailed because his P2P client allowed others to *upload* from him       (as most / all p2p clients do).              Nobody would or could be similarly nailed for downloading from       file-lockers or usenet binaries.              And all of that applies in Canada too. With one additional wrinkle -       the fees or levies applied to various forms of storage media designed to       be fed back into the music industry. The very existance of such renders       any sort of legal action against p2p copyright violation murky and       un-tested.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca