XPost: can.infobahn   
   From: aldeasc.hile@googlemail.com   
      
   Some Guy wrote on 28. July 2012:   
   >   
   > Happynet Steering Society wrote:   
   >   
   >> > Correct me if I'm wrong, but I would attribute the poor sound   
   >> > quality (inability to understand the dialog) to the acoustics   
   >> > of the theater and/or how the theater sound levels were adjusted.   
   >>   
   >> In a really good pirated "cam" version,  the pirate dude sets the   
   >> video camera up in the projection box on a tripod and gets the   
   >> audio via a "line" from the projector.   
   >   
   > The point I was making went right over your head.   
   >   
   > What you posted is completely irrelavent to my question about the sound   
   > quality AS HEARD BY THE PEOPLE IN THE THEATER AND AS RECORDED BY A   
   > HAND-HELD CAM-CORDER.   
   >   
   > Now I'll re-state my thesis:   
   >   
   > If you believe that a modern cam-corder has sufficient technical   
   > performance to be able to faithfully and accurately record a movie   
   > sound-track from the position and point-of-view of a person sitting in a   
   > theater, then the sound quality of the cam-rip of the current Batman   
   > movie would indicate that the modern movie-going experience sucks from a   
   > sound-quality point of view regardless if you're a human with good   
   > hearing ability or if you're a hand-held cam-corder.   
      
   Of course you can with a hand held cam with a single and probably cheap   
   microphone, which can only record mono, capture the 5 channel Dolby audio   
   in superb quality if you have audience next to you, eating popcorn,   
   laughing and farting. Your image will also be 3D on your 10" netbook   
   screen. Not even glasses needed for that, so good is the video quality.   
   --   
   Ank   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)