Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    can.internet.highspeed    |    Supposed to be for Canuck DSL/cable nets    |    27,972 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 26,450 of 27,972    |
|    Some Guy to JF Mezei    |
|    Re: So how is the Voltage Pictures / Tek    |
|    30 Jan 13 18:27:02    |
      From: Some@Guy.com              JF Mezei wrote:              > Unless I get the list of IP addresses and the other data collected       > by Canipre, there is no way to make an educated opinion on the       > quality of the data.              The list of IP addresses they have (and why they can say with confidence       that any single one of them was infringing their copyrights) is one side       of the coin.              The other side is arguing that Tek Savvy's logging equipment, methods,       and software can (or can't) confidently be used to identify which       customer had a particular IP address at a particular date/time.              I'm more curious about that other side, and to what extent that either       Canipre or CIPPIC is fully aware of these details, or if TS would be       cooperative (or not) in providing those details to either party - or the       court.              Or do you think that an argument against disclosure would revolve around       arguments other than if IP-assignment logs can be trusted... ?              > in particular Canipre says it was able to extract only IPs of       > Ontario residents (which can't be done)              What is the difference between "extracting IP's" - vs observing (and       recording) the IP addresses of peers participating in a given torrent       over time?              My experience with what is knowable about those participating in a       torrent is limited to the list of peers and seeders that my torrent       client displays for any given torrent that I am downloading (which       frequently include IP's that geo-locate to a wide variety of       countries). Would Canipre "see" different information when they are       doing their monitoring?              > Although nobody monitors this newsgroup, one also has to be careful       > about giving Voltage laywers a preview of the types of arguments       > CIPPIC might come up with.              Well, yes, but speaking as someone who is completely unfamiliar with       what sort of arguments have been put forward in previous situations in       court in the past, I wouldn't think that any new arguments or concepts       could really be brought forward in what today must be a "mature" field       of law...              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca