home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   can.legal      Debating Canuck legal system quirks      10,932 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 10,018 of 10,932   
   John KingofthePaupers Turmel to All   
   TURMEL: Asking to strike $250min/$1,000m   
   25 Jun 15 11:24:58   
   
   From: johnturmel@yahoo.com   
      
   TURMEL: Asking to strike $250min/$1,000max Election Audit Fee cap Tuesday   
      
   JCT: On Tuesday June 30 9:30a will be heard my Motion for   
   Summary Judgment in Federal Court at 180 Queen St. W Toronto   
   to strike down the 40-year-old $250 cap on auditor's fees   
   for null returns.   
      
   While I'm at it, I'm going to ask if the judge can strike   
   the 40-year-old $1,500 cap on auditor fees. I'd bet that   
   does not cover the audit fees of almost every major party   
   candidate in Canada. Right?   
      
   Candidates with a thousand contributions, hundreds of   
   election expenses for signs, catering, transport, balloons   
   are hardly likely to have any known accounting firm to do   
   that for a 40-year-old maximum.   
      
   So, since I ask for any other Order, why not ask to strike   
   that unrealistic limit too. Won't the big parties love me!   
      
   Of course, my last post details how the Crown need more time   
   to prepare their response. And they want a Case Management   
   Judge to plan getting to the final hearing after I've just   
   filed for the final hearing! Har har har har har har. No   
   Direction on that request yet with the hearing Tuesday.   
      
   I wrote the Crown a Letter in Reply:   
      
   John C. Turmel, B.Eng.,   
   June 22 2015   
      
   Andrea Wheeler   
   Department of Justice   
      
   Re: TURMEL, John v Her Majesty The Queen in Right of Canada   
   Court File No T-561-15   
        In your letter dated June 18, 2015, you indicate your   
   desire for a case management judge. Given I've moved for   
   summary judgment, I'd think there'd be no need of a judge to   
   manage our getting there.   
        As for your bring unable to prepare your motion before   
   June 30 2015, it's a rather simple issue, just do your best.   
   With two more weeks, maybe you can still meet the challenge.   
      
   JCT: So let's see if they can get their Response printed by   
   Tuesday. I really can't imagine what more we need than the   
   facts of my situation and the legislation with the   
   unconscionably out-dated cap on my auditor's fee.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca