Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    can.legal    |    Debating Canuck legal system quirks    |    10,932 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 10,038 of 10,932    |
|    John KingofthePaupers Turmel to All    |
|    TURMEL: Turner Crown misleads Court to s    |
|    11 Aug 15 14:35:45    |
      From: johnturmel@yahoo.com              JCT: James Turner's Smith BENO Quash motion was brought       before Madame Justice Sheard. Seems it may have been her       first day on the bench, she said she was new.       put off by for hearing on Aug 31, 2015, the date of White's       desired pre-trial.              The Crown Brent Lepage told her that the trial had already       started, that there had already been a "voir dire" (trial       within a trial) on Turner's this Constitutional "Mernagh       Plus" Charter Motion and that they had a Pre-Trial       conference booked for Aug 31 2015 to discuss whether James'       pre-plea Quash motion will even be heard.              James is hard of hearing, he has two hearing aids. But the       government cut back on his batteries so he didn't hear the       lead in statement that would have let him belie the Crown.       He only asked: "Does the fact they gave me a date for trial       mean my trial is now started?" She missed the point. Most       did. He'd have been better to say: "I haven't even pleaded       yet, there was no voir dire because the trial hasn't even       started! Who's my judge then?"              So without correction, she thought the trial had already       started though them talking about a "PRE-trial" after a       trial has started should have been a red flag something was       wrong. I think James must be the first to have a pre-trial       after trial has started!!! But no one seems to have noticed       his motion being put off to a pre-trial because his trial       had already started! Har har har.              Here's the point. I don't think Crown Lepage knowingly lied       to the judge to mislead her. I think Stephen White knowingly       misled Lepage by sending him with the wrong information and       mis-naming whatever proceeding had disallowed Turner's       constitutional challenge a "voir dire" which dismisses it       during the trial. White knows the trial did not start and       the hearing to disallow the Charter motion was not a "voir       dire" but calling it that let Lepage come in and add that       the trial must be started for the voir dire to have been       settled. "Oops! says Mr. White"              So White probably set up Lepage to mislead the judge about       what happened earlier and get the Quash Motion put off to       another quasi-orthodox hearing and see if he can get this       one "disallowed rather than dismissed" like the other.              So he got what he wanted. The Aug 31 2105 hearing is set on       whether they'll even let James have a hearing or whether the       motion will be disallowed.              When James objected to his lousy 15 minute motion being put       off to be discussed, Justice Sheard stuck it to the Crown by       making them commit to responding to the motion, not just       showing up to try to prevent it's being heard!! Great. Thank       you Madame Justice. She may have slipped on the "pre-trial       after trial start" like most others but she sure did her job       of taking care of a self-defender's rights before her court.              The only major mistake she made was when James asked if he       could speak to his advisor. But the Crown objected saying       the advisor wasn't a lawyer. What's neat is that the Crown       has no grounds to object, if I was a lawyer, I'd be before       the bar with him, the request can only be to consult with       someone not before the bar. And just last Friday, when Jon       Nesbitt asked to speak to his advisor, sure. Didn't care who       or what I was. But she fell for it, why could the Crown       object if he didn't have grounds?              One thing the Crown keeps repeating, no doubt misled by       White, that this is the 3rd of 4th time James raises this       issue: Smith! From June 2 months ago! Har har har. Looks       like he never even read it, just went to repeat what White       put in his mouth.              So I decided to rain on Mr. White's parade. He thinks he's       got what he wanted. If we do nothing, we're at the next       hearing and misleading the court to get there will be       forgotten. I told Jim that our only chance to catch the       Crown on all the lies is to drag them in again at the next       chance. So James filled out 3 more Quash kits and went to       get it filed for next Monday Aug 17!!              At the Trial Coordinator's Office, he told her how the crown       had gotten it put off by telling the judge the trial had       already started which is why he's going right back. She       agreed that she had not yet scheduled the trial and it       couldn't have started without her knowing! Har har har.              So at the next hearing, James gets to say: Check with the       Trial Coordinator who will verify two previous courts were       misled about the void dire being held at a trial!              Har har har har har har. So James is booked back for Aug 17       and this time, the Crown is going to be exposed for lying to       the bench, whether it's Lepage who'll be taken by surprise       or White who'll get what he deserves. Har har har har har       har. Won't that be worth watching?              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca