Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    can.legal    |    Debating Canuck legal system quirks    |    10,932 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 10,053 of 10,932    |
|    John KingofthePaupers Turmel to All    |
|    TURMEL: 14 on docket in Ontario's highes    |
|    18 Sep 15 13:28:49    |
      From: johnturmel@yahoo.com              JCT: When my buddy Del went in to serve and file Doug       Nielsen and Mike Spottiswood's Motions on time, Her Majesty       Her Majesty The Clerk didn't like how it had been formatted       and wouldn't accept it. Del didn't know about the Ali Baba       Open Sesame words to the judge's desk, my Magic Blurb, that       asks the judge for any order abridging any time for service       or amending any error or omission as to form, color, font,       margins, content which the Honourable Justice may deem just.       By asking the judge to allow any irregularity, it isn't the       decision of Her Majesty.              She sent back a list of objections, including the wrong       color! Maybe it wasn't beige enough? The Queen's name was       supposed to be on top, not the Plaintiff's!! After all these       decades, I find out. What's weird is that my motion was       accepted last week in that format with no problem. Har har       har.              So I took their Motions with service on the back, popped       them into an envelope, added a note that our Magic Blurb was       asking the judge to allow any thing amiss and sent it in.       Now, with no one to stop, they had to let them in. And all       the other ones the next day. They got calls informing them       their motions were on.              Then six more motions reached my desk and were again mailed       in. I got a call from another clerk telling me the docket       was filled with my original 8 motions and they couldn't put       on the extra six.              I insisted that they had a right to be on the docket with me       because of the Open Sesame and that it would be silly to be       booking them for another day when I was going to be the only       speaker for the group.              What could she say? She said she'd check with the judge and       see if they could all go with me. She called back later and       said that we were all on the docket.              At 9am, I'm going to holding a march around Osgoode Hall       with my 14 foot placard before going in for the 10am       hearing. Meeting there after 9am.              The import of Smith has not been raised until our motion       just as the import of Hitzig had not been raised until       J.P.'s motion. This should be one heck of a show, especially       since it's coming up on other provinces next.              Limits on growers rather than limits on use?              If J.P. got No Offence with the Hitzig Bad Exemption,       We want No Offence with the Worse Smith Bad Exemption.       I want the same treatment before the law J.P. got.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca