From: johnturmel@yahoo.com   
      
   JCT: I filed my Motion for Leave for Summary Judgment on the   
   Bad Exemptions needing a declaration of No Offence and   
   Justice Phelan just denied it.   
      
                                            File No: T-488-14   
                                                     20151106   
                         FEDERAL COURT   
   BETWEEN:   
                        JOHN C. TURMEL   
                                                   Applicant   
                              and   
      
                     HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN   
                                                  Respondent   
                              ORDER   
      
   UPON MOTION by the Plaintiff for leave to lift the Stay   
   Order (May 7 2014) in respect of his Statement of Claim and   
   to proceed with his motion for Summary Judgment.   
      
   AND UPON the Court having ordered that motions to lift a   
   stay are to proceed by way of rule 369 motion;   
      
   AND UPON CONSIDERING that:   
      
   1. Section 50(3) of the Federal Court Act gives the Court   
   the discretion to lift a stay;   
      
   2. the discretion to life the stay should take into   
   consideration whether the facts are "substantially different   
   from the facts upon which the original disposition was made"   
   (Del Zotto);   
      
   3. the Applicant has not shown any substantial change of   
   facts upon which the stay order was made;   
      
   4. the Allard trial is complete, final submissions were   
   concluded in July and a decision is pending;   
      
   JCT: And we have to await all appeals.. as if he forgot..   
      
   5. the Plaintiff is, in effect, attempting to re-litigate   
   the stay order in the face of a pending appeal; and   
      
   6. There is no proper basis for lifting the stay of   
   proceedings.   
      
   THIS COURT ORDERS that the motion be dismissed with costs   
   payable forthwith of $200.   
      
   Michael J. Phelan   
      
   JCT: He thinks he's going to keep stalling me until   
   Parliament changes things and we never get justice. But it's   
   my ticket to the top. People were dying and Play-Doctor   
   Judge wants to cite technicalities.. He won't let me re-   
   argue his old motion though he granted me the chance to try!   
   Har har har har har har. Okay, you can file for leave but   
   when you do, I'm going to rule why bother, you can't   
   overturn my decision anyway. So you have to wonder why he   
   said I could apply for leave when he's saying I can't re-   
   open the issue. Har har har har har har. You can ask but you   
   can't have.   
      
   Anyway, next step complaining that all he's doing is keeping   
   the evidence the Health Canada Stats fraud out of   
   discussion. Right? Because of Justice Phelan, the Health   
   Canada fraud gets covered up. And despite knowing the fraud,   
   he's the judge who's going to back up the fraudulent limit   
   again.   
      
   So you can bet I want my appeal against his not letting the   
   fraud argument in into the historical archives. Imagine, he   
   knows about the fraud and he's now going to validate   
   Manson's decision based on it. Wow. Is he going to get what   
   he deserves.   
      
   With two Gold Star corpses now, Shea and Tillman, both   
   denied exemptions to use cannabis by Justice Phelan. Blood   
   on his hands! Now extrapolate those 2/300 deaths to   
   60/18,000 Left-Outs. Probably five dozen corpses while he   
   stalled my motion for repeal, which Allard didn't move for.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)