home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   can.legal      Debating Canuck legal system quirks      10,932 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 10,118 of 10,932   
   John KingofthePaupers Turmel to All   
   TURMEL: Demanding BENO Quash Motions be    
   19 Apr 16 06:54:32   
   
   From: johnturmel@yahoo.com   
      
   JCT: Tomorrow, April 20!, Ben Perreault in Montreal and Rene   
   Ouellet in Quebec City trying to get their Quash motions   
   heard. I'm so tired of Quebec judges ducking their duty to   
   act under S.601 to Amend an Indictment promptly when asked   
   that I've prepared a little blurb Quashers can memorize and   
   deliver or print and hand in. April 19 2016   
      
              TRYING TO GET YOUR QUASH MOTION HEARD   
      
   This motion is being considered by 4 judges in 3 other   
   provinces.   
   No Constitutional Notice was required under S.601.   
   None was Trial Judge, all were judges of first instance.   
      
   R. v. Neron ON Timmins Superior Court Justice Riopelle   
   R. v. Krzyz Jasper AB Provincial Court Justice Haggerty   
   R. v. Enns Halifax NS Provincial Court Justice Tax   
   R. v. Butler Shelburne NS Provincial Court Justice Burrill   
      
   Your Honor is my judge of first instance and have the same   
   duty to adjudicate my motion as promptly as those other   
   judges had.   
      
      
   Cette requete est en delibere par 4 juges dans 3 provinces:   
   Aucun Avis Constitutionel etait requit sous la S.601.   
   Aucun etait le juge du proces, tous de premiere instance.   
      
   R. v. Neron ON Timmins Superior Court Justice Riopelle   
   R. v. Krzyz Jasper AB Provincial Court Justice Haggerty   
   R. v. Enns Halifax NS Provincial Court Justice Tax   
   R. v. Butler Shelburne NS Provincial Court Justice Burrill   
      
   Votre Honneur est mon juge de premiere instance et vous avez   
   le meme devoir de regler ma requete aussi promptement que   
   ces autres juges.   
      
   JCT: I just want to mention that our most promising judge   
   will be ruling in just over a week in Jasper Alberta. 28th.   
   It will be the first decision on the Allard-Smith Quash!!   
      
   Sure, there are other Smith Quash motions out there but in   
   this one, Voytek used Allard a few days right after because   
   he was busted within the period of the MMPR that has now been   
   struck down and best of all, he was busted within his   
   previous MMAR travel limit! Neat eh? So he gets his 6K limit   
   of pot back. He might have been a few ounces over, those   
   they can keep.   
      
   Plus Judge Haggerty had seemed to have done research on the   
   history of Quash powers. Hard to believe he won't see the   
   analogy to J.P. and J.P. wasn't even medical while Voytek   
   is.   
      
   And Judge Haggerty seems nearing retirement age so he may   
   want to shake up the nation before he goes.   
      
   Final note, he heard it all from "Keep It Super Simple" me.   
   Talk fast and say it once. He seemed to enjoy the pace. So   
   you can appreciate how rosy things look to me.   
      
   Plus, all the judges know some other judges may see the   
   logic after they said no! Hope that adds righteous pressure   
   on them all. I do believe that the plethora of motions   
   across the country, now in 6 provinces, has made them all   
   take it very seriously.   
      
   So thanks everyone who have taken up self-defence. It's an   
   epic adventure.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca