From: johnturmel@yahoo.com   
      
   JCT: So you know that the Crown labelled my Motion for   
   Summary Judgment as a Motion for Default Judgment and for   
   the Motion for Default Judgment stayed.   
      
   John C. Turmel, B.Eng.,   
   50 Brant Ave.,   
   Brantford, N3T 3G7,   
   Tel/Fax: 519-753-5122,   
   Cell: 519-717-5198   
      
   May 9 2016   
   VIA FASCIMILE   
      
   Registries of the Federal Court   
   90 Sparks St. 5th floor Ottawa K1A 0H9   
      
   Dear Sir/Madam:   
      
   1. This is my letter in response to the Defendant's April 26   
   2016 request by letter.   
      
   2. On Monday May 2, 2016, Justice Phelan handed down his   
   ruling on the Crown's Request I had yet to received.   
      
   3. On Monday May 2 2016, I received the Crown's Letter of   
   Request asking the Court to refuse to file or to stay the   
   Motion for Default Judgment. Though the letter was dated   
   Tuesday April 26, it was not posted until Thursday April 28   
   afternoon, thus ensuring it would not arrive until Monday   
   next week May 2.   
      
   5. Given the expedition of the Court in granting Canada's   
   request, I had no opportunity to respond to the Request I   
   had not yet received.   
      
   5. Rule 208 says it takes a:   
       Motion to object   
       208 A party who has been served with a statement of   
       claim and who brings a motion to object to   
       (a) any irregularity in the commencement of the action,   
       (b) the service of the statement of claim,   
       (c) the Court as not being a convenient forum, or   
       (d) the jurisdiction of the Court, does not thereby   
       attorn to the jurisdiction of the Court.   
      
   6. Rule 208 says objecting to irregularities in the action,   
   or the Court not being a convenient forum or having   
   jurisdiction, has to be done by way of motion.   
      
   7. Canada has not made any motion objecting to my Motion for   
   Summary Judgment and a letter to the Clerk objecting to the   
   Motion for Default Judgment does not follow the Rules. Why   
   does the Crown get to send letters to the Administrator   
   which is not the proper way to object? Should Her Majesty   
   not also comply with the rules?   
      
   8. CR: Canada has therefore clearly indicated an intention   
   to defend this proceeding should the need arise. The motion   
   for default judgment is inappropriate in these   
   circumstances.   
      
   9. The need arose to defend within 30 days when the   
   Statement of Claim was served. Intention to defend is shown   
   by filing a Statement of Defence or a Motion to Object, not   
   missing the 30-day deadline then relying on improperly-   
   founded backroom requests to the Registry. No Notice, no   
   affidavits, no factum, Her Majesty breaking the Rules.   
      
   10. On May 2 2016, Justice Phelan ruled:   
      
                                  ORDER   
      
       UPON MOTION by the Plaintiff for default judgment;   
       AND UPON the Defendant having brought a motion to strike   
       the Plaintiff's claim (along with a number of similar   
       claims by other plaintiffs);   
       AND UPON the Plaintiff not having obtained leave of the   
       Court to bring a motion for default judgment against the   
       Crown, as required by s 25 of the Crown Liability and   
       Proceedings Act;   
       THIS COURT ORDERS that this motion is stayed until the   
       disposition of the Defendant's motion to strike without   
       costs.   
       "Michael L. Phelan" Judge   
      
   11. Now that any Motion for Default Judgment has been   
   stayed, I request a date to proceed with my 20-minute Motion   
   for Summary Judgment.   
      
      
      
   __________________________   
   John C. Turmel   
      
   CC: Jon Bricker for the Respondent   
      
   JCT: Har har har har har har. Let the Court stay the Crown's   
   imaginary Motion for Default Judgment. What do I care? Until   
   my Motion for Summary Judgment is officially amended to   
   Default Judgment, nothing has changed. Pure bluff and I'm   
   calling. I want to hear Phelan explain why the Motion for   
   Summary Judgment was really a Motion for Default Judgment he   
   could stay.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)