From: johnturmel@yahoo.com   
      
   TURMEL: Marie-Eve Turmel files NO Constitutional Question   
      
   JCT: My niece Marie-Eve Turmel was busted with 3 grams and 3   
   clones a while back and filed her motion to S.601 Quash   
   motion. That was put off to July 22 2016 by Judge Anouk   
   Desaulniers who deemed it was a Constitutional Question   
   needing a Notice of Constitutional Question to all of Canada   
   Attorneys General. Okay. Done. Served by fax on all of them.   
      
   CANADA   
   PROVINCE OF QUEBEC   
   DISTRICT OF GATINEAU           COURT OF QUEBEC   
   NO: 550-01-087798-155         (Criminal Chamber)   
      
                                 Between   
                                 Marie-Eve Turmel   
                                 Applicant   
      
                                 -and-   
      
                                 Attorney General for Quebec   
                                 Respondent   
      
             NOTICE OF ""NO"" CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION   
      
   TAKE NOTICE that at 9:30a on July 22 2016 will be heard a   
   Motion to Quash pursuant to S.601 of the Criminal Code at   
   the Gatineau Courthouse which will raise no constitutional   
   questions.   
      
   From the second paragraph of the Quash motion: Ontario   
   Superior Court Justice Rogin in R. v. J.P. (2003) noted that   
   for the S.601 Quash Motion before him:   
       "[5] The Crown complains that notwithstanding that   
       J.P.'s Original application was not a Canadian Charter   
       of Rights application... the factum specifically states   
       that J.P. did not challenge the constitutionality of the   
       regulations which Phillips J. found not to contain an   
       offence."   
      
   But Judge Anouk Desaulniers has ordered that a Notice of   
   Constitutional Question be served on all provincial   
   Attorneys General. Though Parker and Hitzig raised   
   constitutional questions needing constitutional notice,   
   J.P.'s S.601 motion to quash did not. Though Parker and   
   Smith raised constitutional issues needing notice, my S.601   
   motion does not.   
      
   I hereby serve you notice that no constitutional questions   
   will be raised at the hearing.   
      
   Dated at Gatineau Quebec on May 19 2016.   
      
   _____________________________   
   Applicant/Accused Signature   
   Marie-Eve Turmel   
      
   FAXED TO:   
   Attorney General of Canada 613-990-7255   
   Attorney General of Alberta 780-422-6621   
   Attorney General of British Columbia 250-356-9154   
   Attorney General of Manitoba 204-945-2517   
   Attorney General of New Brunswick 506-453-3651   
   Attorney General of Newfoundland 709-729-2129   
   Attorney General of Northwest Territories 867-873-0307   
   Attorney General of Nova Scotia 902-424-1730   
   Attorney General of Nunavut 867 975-6349   
   Attorney General of Ontario 416-326-4007   
   Attorney General of Prince Edward Island 902-368-4910   
   Attorney General of Quebec 418-646-0027   
   Attorney General of Saskatchewan 306-787-1232   
   Attorney General of Yukon 867-393-6379   
      
   JCT: Aaaaahhhh. I've been wanting to do that to a judge for   
   a long time. And it couldn't look better than on Judge Anouk   
   Desaulniers.   
      
   She was the Crown Attorney who put Ray in jail a decade ago.   
   Must have forgotten the tough time it was. Must have seen   
   "Turmel" on the indictment and thought it would be easy.   
      
   She hadn't even bothered to read it. Hadn't noticed how it   
   was explained that other judges didn't need Constitutional   
   Notice to hear the Quash. She just made a hasty judgment and   
   now gets to be joked about in the offices of 14 Attorneys   
   General. If there had to be a first, nice it was her.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)