From: johnturmel@yahoo.com   
      
   JCT: I just got a letter from the Crown to the Supreme Court   
   Registrar   
      
   May 25 2016   
   VIA COURIER   
      
   Mr. Roger Bilodeau, Registrar,   
      
   Mr. Registrar:   
      
   Re: Raymond Turmel v. HMTQ Court file No. 36927   
   Robert Roy v. HMTQ Court file No. 36928   
   Stephen Patrick Burrows v. HMTQ Court file No. 36929   
   Cheryl M. Hawkins v. HMTQ Court file No. 36930   
   John C. Turmel v. HMTQ Court file No. 36937   
   Terrance Parker v. HMTQ Court file No. 36938   
   Arthur Jackes v. HMTQ Court file No. 36939   
   Elsie Gear v. HMTQ Court file No. 36940   
   Heidi Chartrand v. HMTQ Court file No. 36941   
      
   JCT: So those are the 9 of the 26 Federal Court of Appeal   
   Appellants who've asked for Leave to Appeal Phelan playing   
   doctor on their files. All classes covered. Ray for ATP   
   against MMAR conditions, several Left-Outs, several Never-   
   Ins but Should-have-been-Ins, and healthy me wanting its   
   benefits.   
      
   CR: Further to Canada's previously filed responses to the   
   applications for leave to appeal in the above-noted matters,   
   I am writing to provide clarification concerning the costs   
   portion of the Federal Court of Appeal decision below.   
      
   In its responses to the leave applications, Canada noted   
   that the applicants' appeals to the Federal Court of Appeal   
   were dismissed "with costs." In fact, only the appeal of the   
   lead appellant in the Federal Court of Appeal and applicant   
   herein, John C. Turmel, was dismissed with costs. The   
   appeals of the remaining appellants were dismissed without   
   costs in accordance with an undertaking by Mr. Turmel to   
   bear the costs of all appellants in the consolidated   
   appeals.   
      
   Yours truly,   
   Jon Bricker   
   Counsel Business and Regulatory Law Division   
      
   JCT: Ah, they had to correct an error. A little one. Wish   
   they'd do better with their big ones.   
      
   Finally, applicants do not have to file a Reply. And since   
   I've filed a Reply to counter their arguments, the other 8   
   applicants may rest easy, your end of it is done. It's   
   getting to 3 of Canada's top judges. Just don't expect much.   
   They usually think people suffering from lack of meds, even   
   dying, not nationally important enough.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)