From: johnturmel@yahoo.com   
      
   JCT: Of the original 270 Gold Stars at the April 29 2014 Big   
   Event, 50 had filed motions for interim exemptions for   
   Personal Medical Use with Affidavits including their MMAR   
   permit information.   
      
   Like FBI Director Comey looked at all the evidence then said   
   "Not enough," Judge Phelan looked at their permit number and   
   said "Not enough!" See how the Judge's Prerogative works? No   
   matter the evidence, he can always say he has not seen   
   enough. Of course, having his eyes closed helps him stay   
   truthful. Har har har.   
      
   But here, we argue Judge Phelan had no right to demand to   
   see our medical information. None of his business to deny   
   meds to patients without a medical license but he and   
   Justice Manson did it anyway.   
      
   So 26 filed kits to appeal and the Court of Appeal dismissed   
   saying they couldn't interfere with Phelan's discretion to   
   decide to let them suffer or die. No kidding. David Shea   
   action for Exemption for Personal Medical Use was stayed by   
   Phelan and now he's dead. Of course, Phelan decreased his   
   chances of survival, of course, he's statistically culpable   
   even if never found guilty on this earth.   
      
   And 9 filed kits for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of   
   Canada against Phelan not giving out the meds without seeing   
   the medical files.   
   John Turmel   
   Ray Turmel   
   Sharon Misener   
   Art Jackes   
   Cheryle Hawkins   
   Terry Parker   
   Heidi Chartrand   
   Stephen Burrows   
   Robert Roy   
      
   Supreme Court of Canada Justices McLachlin, Moldaver, Gascon   
   dismissed accepting Phelan keeping patients away from their   
   meds was a discretion he had that should not be tampered   
   with. Too bad about all the corpses.   
      
   Now, there is a rarely used option to move for   
   reconsideration. But it take something extra. I've done it   
   before when I really wanted to slam the judges for being   
   unjust. Stick the crime in their faces. And I didn't have a   
   final stake to the heart I could use and wasn't going to   
   urge people to file it just to have it rejected with nothing   
   new.   
      
   But as I was talking to Sharon Misener last week about her   
   recent problems with the legislation, she was laid low by   
   her tumors for months and had to shut down her grow, can't   
   change to a DG! And then, she had no access to oil when she   
   did get sick. Luckily, an angel sent her some that started   
   her on her way to recovery. But that peril remains. Get   
   sicker, no meds.   
      
   I grew so incensed that the zinger I was looking for to file   
   for reconsideration came up:   
      
   Manson cut off cheap meds to 18,000 patients.   
   Phelan played doctor to keep those cut off from getting back   
   on their meds.   
   The 3 Court of Appeal panel ruled they saw no reason to   
   interfere with Phelan's discretion.   
   The 3 Supreme Court of Canada panel too.   
      
   If a doctor had cut off half a hospital's prescriptions   
   based on the dates of their prescriptions,   
   If a panel saw no reason to interfere with his discretion to   
   cut off half the patients for a non-medical reason,   
   If the final panel saw no reason to interfere with cutting   
   off half the patients meds based on dates,   
   Those doctors would be on death row.   
   As you judges responsible for such suffering and death merit   
   the same distinction.   
      
   Sure, Phelan's got all the files stalled on his desk right   
   now, but when this is over, it'll be time to tally the toll   
   of souls he caused to die, legally, his discretion. Just   
   like in Heaven, the real punishment is the shame of everyone   
   knowing the evil you did. And when it results in dead   
   people, I wonder what it'll be like wandering around heaven   
   with everyone knowing you killed people. Maybe the wicked   
   will remain silent in the grave if coming out causes too   
   much vomit in the bleachers.   
      
   Anyway, we had 10 days from June 3 and that would make us   
   late now except Supreme Court doesn't sit in July so we have   
   until Aug 3, not July 3 to file.   
      
   Since I have all the right materials, and it will be short,   
   just a punch line for those who want to explain how it hurt.   
   So those who want to file a motion for reconsideration, just   
   send me an image or picture of your signature and any   
   personal details you'd like to add about how you suffered,   
   and I'll prepare them here and mail them all in together.   
      
   If doctors would end up on death row for cutting meds for   
   non-medical reasons, why not judges? Oh right, they weren't   
   doctors, no professional misconduct! Just corpses.   
      
   So, those who want to deem judges as guilty as doctors in   
   cutting meds to patients, make sure I have your signatures   
   and anything you'd like to add to the guys who should be on   
   death row for letting Phelan play doctor with patient lives.   
      
   What do you think, will telling them they deserve death row   
   for what they've done get reconsideration? Even if not, nice   
   ending to the case for historians.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)