home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   can.legal      Debating Canuck legal system quirks      10,932 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 10,173 of 10,932   
   John KingofthePaupers Turmel to All   
   TURMEL: Sharon Misener asks Supreme Cour   
   23 Aug 16 19:02:58   
   
   From: johnturmel@yahoo.com   
      
   JCT: Yesterday, Sharon Misener asked the Supreme Court to   
   reconsider Phelan playing doctor and insisting on seeing her   
   medical evidence before giving her Interim Exemption.   
      
   Beverly Sharon Misener,   
   Larder Lake, ON, P0K 1L0   
      
   Aug 22 2016   
   VIA FASCIMILE   
      
   Mr. Roger Bilodeau, Registrar   
   Supreme Court of Canada   
      
   Mr. Registrar:   
      
   RE: Sharon Misener v. HMTQ No. 36991   
      
   Please accept this letter as the Applicant's Motion for   
   Reconsideration of the dismissal of the Application for leave to   
   appeal. Applicant also seeks an order abridging any time for   
   filing or any other irregularity this court may allow because of   
   my medical condition.   
      
   I raise no new facts presuming my medical condition was   
   considered but only raise one important new conclusion from those   
   facts.   
      
   In 2013, Health Canada announced it would no longer be granting   
   any production permits after Oct. 1 2013 with no grow permits   
   after April 1 2014. Patients with expiring MMAR exemptions were   
   instructed to destroy their stored medicine and be exempted with   
   proof of purchase from an MMPR Licensed Producer.   
      
   Though hailed as a reprieve for Canada's cannabis patients, on   
   Mar 21 2001, almost 6 months later, Federal Court Justice Manson   
   granted an injunction extending all grow permits back to Oct 1   
   2013, whether expired or not, but then did not extend all possess   
   permits needed to grow expired or not. Only those not yet expired   
   were extended. Those with expired possess exemptions would not be   
   able to use their grow permits thus cutting almost half of the   
   patients from their affordable supply. Justice Manson dis-   
   exempted over 18,000 medical marijuana patient growers and it   
   didn't make the news. Only a reprieve for half, the Left-Outs   
   unmentioned.   
      
   Later in 2014, 50 Applicants of patients seeking Interim   
   Exemptions pending action in the Federal Court based upon their   
   MMAR permit number as proof of medical need were rejected by   
   Justice Phelan who insisted on seeing more medical evidence upon   
   which he was not qualified to judge.   
      
   The 26 who appealed to the Federal Court of Appeal were   
   dismissed. And the 11 who sought leave to appeal to the Supreme   
   Court were also dismissed.   
      
   During this time, I almost died. I was hospitalized with the   
   recurrence of tumors with no access to oil and only an angel   
   provisioner helped get back on my feet.   
      
   If a doctor had cut off half a hospital's prescriptions based on   
   the dates of their prescriptions, he'd probably be in jail or, in   
   some countries, on death row.   
      
   If a panel of doctors had seen no reason to interfere with his   
   discretion to cut off half the patients for a non-medical reason,   
   they'd probably be with him.   
      
   If the final panel saw no reason to interfere with cutting off   
   half patient medication based on dates, they'd be with them.   
      
   If doctors could not get away with what the courts have done, is   
   that not an indication that courts should not have done it?   
      
   Denying medicine to 18,000 patients is a matter of national   
   importance and the request for interim exemption to again   
   immediately begin growing their affordable medicine is of   
   national importance too.   
      
   I seek an Order granting leave to appeal the refusal to grant me   
   Interim Exemption for insufficient evidence of medical need. In   
   order to avoid much duplication of documentation, should I be   
   granted leave to appeal, I would ask that my fellow Applicants be   
   included in such Order:   
   John Turmel, Ray Turmel, Art Jackes, Cheryle Hawkins, Terry   
   Parker, Heidi Chartrand, Stephen Burrows, Robert Roy, Luc   
   Leblanc, Jessica Leblanc   
      
   Dated at Larder Lake on Aug 21 2016   
   Beverly Sharon Misener,   
   CC: Jon Bricker for the Respondent: FAX: 416-973-0809   
      
   JCT: At least it's in the archive that the judges, like the   
   doctors, are being called a bunch of genocidal butchers who   
   deserve to be in jail.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca