From: johnturmel@yahoo.com   
      
   JCT: Robert Neron had chosen to accept his conviction to get   
   his equipment back within 30 days. Unfortunately, that's when   
   his appeal period ran out. Then the Crown ignored the Court   
   Order and kept his equipment. So he's filed a motion to an   
   extension of time to appeal.   
      
   Court File No. _________   
                    COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO   
   Between:   
                            Robert Neron   
                                                        Applicant   
                                and   
      
                       Her Majesty the Queen   
                                                       Respondent   
      
                     NOTICE OF APPLICATION FOR   
             EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE NOTICE OF APPEAL   
      
   TAKE NOTICE that on Aug 30, 2016 at 9:30am in the   
   Courthouse at Osgoode Hall, 130 Queen St. W., in Toronto,   
   Applicant will make a application to a judge for an Order:   
      
   1) extending the time to file and serve a Notice of Appeal   
   against the dismissal of Applicant's S.601 motion to quash and   
   against the sentence but not against conviction if the   
   validity of the S.4(1) offence if upheld;   
      
   2) allowing Appellant to file an audio CD of the hearing or   
   dispense with the transcript but for the Quash and Sentence   
   decisions under appeal;   
      
   3) an order dispensing with any factum or memorandum of law.   
      
   THE GROUNDS ARE that the Crown's failure to comply with the   
   Court's Order to return my medical equipment within 30 days   
   compels me to seek an extension of time to appeal after that   
   30-day deadline was breached.   
      
   PROPOSED METHOD OF HEARING is oral.   
      
   Dated at Moonbeam on Aug 23, 2016.   
   Robert Neron   
   Box 239, 27 Cimon St.   
   Moonbeam, ON, P0L 1V0   
   Tel: 705-335-7191   
      
   TO: The Registrar of the Ontario Court of Appeal   
      
   AND TO: Attorney General for Canada   
   Mathieux Lambert Belanger,   
   202-85 Oine Street .South.,   
   Timmins, Ontario P4N 2K1 705 264 9591   
      
   JCT: Crown Belanger was a prick. When I go in to the Crown's   
   office in a big town, the clerk usually accepts the document   
   and signs for service. But this hick Crown decided he didn't   
   want to sign forcing Robert to go to a commissioner of oaths   
   to swear an affidavit of service. Should a Crown be allowed   
   to be an asshole just because he can when it's not done in the   
   big cities? Matthieux Belanger thinks so.   
      
                APPLICANT'S AFFIDAVIT FOR EXTENSION   
                  OF TIME TO FILE NOTICE OF APPEAL   
      
      
   I, Robert Neron, residing at 27 Cimon St. in Moonbeam Ontario   
   make oath as follows.   
      
   1. According to the Agreed Statement of Facts, I was raided   
   and charged in ?????? with after complaining to the Police about   
   Health Canada's tardy renewal of my MMAR medical exemption   
   which I received 3 weeks later.   
      
   I, Robert Neron, residing at 27 Cimon St. in Moonbeam Ontario   
   make oath as follows.   
      
   1. According to the appended Agreed Statement of Facts, I was   
   raided and charged in March 2011, after complaining to the   
   Police about Health Canada's tardy renewal of my MMAR medical   
   exemption which I received 3 weeks later.   
      
   2. Upon sentencing, the Court ordered the return of my all my   
   medical equipment and the usual prohibitions on firearms and   
   $600.00 in victim surcharge and to remain in Canada till   
   October 24th, 2016.   
      
   3. I was resigned to accepting my conviction to get my growing   
   equipment back and could not appeal within the required 30-   
   days as I was waiting for my medical equipment. But when the   
   30 days elapsed, my medical equipment was not returned.   
      
   4. The reason I missed the 30-day deadline was the belief I   
   would be getting my medical equipment back in 30 days. Having   
   lost 3 months of production waiting for the Order to be   
   complied with, I instead now seek an extension of time to file   
   the appended Notice of Appeal.   
      
   Sworn before me at __________ on __________________ 2016   
   Robert Neron   
      
   PROPOSED NOTICE OF APPEAL   
      
                   COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO   
   BETWEEN:   
                      HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN   
                                                     Respondent   
                               and   
                           ROBERT NERON   
                                                      Appellant   
                         NOTICE OF APPEAL   
      
   PARTICULARS OF CONVICTION   
   1. Place of conviction: Timmins   
   2. Name of judge: Superior Court Justice Riopelle   
   3. Offences of which accused convicted:   
   Production of cannabis, two counts of possession of cannabis   
   resin, and possession for the purpose of trafficking.   
   4. Section(s) of Criminal Code under which accused convicted:   
   S.7(1), S.4(1), S.5(2) CDSA   
   5. Plea at trial: Guilty   
   6. Length of trial: 1 day   
   7. Sentence imposed: 5.5 month conditional discharge; pay a   
   $600 victim fine surcharge and prohibittion from owning any   
   restricted weapons for the next 10 years. Return of Equipment   
   was ordered within 30 days.   
   8. Date of conviction: May 9 2016   
   9. Date of sentence: May 10 2016   
      
   The appellant appeals upon grounds involving a question of law   
   alone not against conviction but against sentence and   
   dismissal of Appellant's S.601 Motion to Quash.   
      
   THE GROUNDS OF THE APPLICATION ARE just as the Hitzig "Bad   
   Exemption" [2003] by regulated Mis-Supply meant there was "No   
   Offence" in force since Aug 1 2001 absent an acceptable   
   medical exemption when J.P. was charged; so too, the Smith   
   Worse "Bad Exemption" [2015] by regulated Mis-Use means there   
   was "No Offence" in force since Aug 1 2001 absent an   
   acceptable medical exemption when the Accused herein was   
   charged. Applicant's cultivation charge should be quashed   
   while the Smith decision found the medical exemption required   
   by the Alberta Court of Appeal in R. v. Krieger was unworkable   
   between 2001 and 2015. This Court is bound by the Ontario   
   Court of Appeal's J.P. precedent to declare that NO OFFENCE   
   was in force while the Smith BAD EXEMPTION existed since Aug.   
   1 2001, the same as Hitzig, on Terry Parker Day.   
      
   The relief sought is an Order that:   
   A) absent a viable medical exemption, the prohibitions on   
   marijuana in the CDSA are of no force and effect; and   
   B) the Accused's CDSA charges relating to marijuana be quashed   
   as of no force and effect;   
   C) the word "marijuana" be struck from CDSA Schedule II;   
   D) all convictions registered since the Smith Bad Exemption   
   created No Offence be expunged.   
   The appellant's address for service is Box 239, 27 Cimon St.   
   Moonbeam Ontario.   
      
   The appellant's address is the same.   
      
   Dated at Moonbeam on ____________________, 2016   
   ______________________________   
   Robert Neron   
      
      
   JCT: It's lucky that I put a small Affidavit of Service on the   
   back of all my motions that says:   
      
      
                                        RECORD OF APPLICATION   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)