From: johnturmel@yahoo.com   
      
   TURMEL: Rene Ouellet files to remove trial from Judge Roy   
      
   JCT: You'll remember that Judge Morand had slated a hearing   
   for the Quash Motion so it's adjudication could orient his   
   case. Whether the elect to be tried by judge and jury in   
   Superior Court. But when Rene arrived, Judge Johanne Roy told   
   him she was starting his trial in lower court. And she did.   
      
   If she thinks she's going to screw him out of his election,   
   think again Madame. That's what certiorari is for, removing   
   cases to the higher authority. Rene just filed this in Quebec   
   City this morning for hearing on Wednesday Oct 19 2016. With   
   his expected continued trial on Monday Oct 25. We'll see.   
      
   CANADA   
   PROVINCE OF QUEBEC         SUPERIOR COURT OF QUEBEC   
   DISTRICT OF QUEBEC            (Criminal Chamber)   
   LOCALITE: QUEBEC   
   NO: 200-01-180625-141        Between   
                                Applicant   
                                Rene Ouellet   
                                -and-   
                                Attorney General for Quebec   
                                Respondent   
      
                     APPLICATION FOR CERTIOARARI   
      
   TO ONE OF THE HONOURABLE JUDGES OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF   
   QUEBEC (CRIMINAL CHAMBER) SITTING IN AND FOR THE DISTRICT   
   OF QUEBEC, the Applicant states as follows:   
      
   THE APPLICATION IS FOR AN ORDER OF CERTIORARI ordering the   
   removal of the Accused's file from the Provincial Court to the   
   Superior Court for trial by judge and jury.   
      
   AND FOR ANY ORDER abridging any time for service or amending   
   any error or omission as to form, color, font, margins,   
   content which the Honourable Justice may allow.   
      
   THE GROUNDS OF THE APPLICATION ARE that the Accused was always   
   going to elect to be tried by judge and jury.   
      
   OVERVIEW   
      
   1. The Accused was charged with production of marijuana   
   contrary to S.7(1) of the CDSA.   
      
   2. Accused filed a pre-plea Motion to Quash under S.601 to be   
   dealt with by the judge of first instance.   
      
   3. On Feb 19 2016 Judge Johanne Roy ruled that the S.601   
   motion was constitutional and  had to be heard by the Trial   
   Judge though no statute is being challenged under the Charter   
   and sent the Accused to Preliminary Inquiry.   
      
   4. On April 20 2016 at the Preliminary Inquiry, Judge   
   Christian Boulet also refused to adjudicate the Quash motion   
   and ruled sufficient evidence and demanded the election of the   
   accused. When Accused refused to elect until the validity of   
   the indictment had been ruled upon, the judge ordered the   
   clerk enter an election of "trial by Superior Court judge an   
   jury."   
      
   5. On May 9 2016, Superior Court Justice Rene de la   
   Sablonniere of first instance refused to deal with the Quash   
   motion that should have been settled below and sent the file   
   back to Provincial Court for adjudication. Not adjudication of   
   the trial but of the Quash Motion.   
      
   6. On July 29 2016, Judge Alain Morand ascertained that there   
   was no constitutional issue and that the the S.601 Motion to   
   Quash should be adjudicated before the Accused "orients his   
   plea." Due to time constraints, the motion to Quash was   
   adjourned for the first possible hearing to Sep 2 2016.   
      
   7. On Sep 2 2016, Judge Johanne Roy was under the impression   
   that she was hearing the trial and was completely unaware of   
   the motion to Quash.??? Without election or plea, she started   
   the trial and dismissed the motion to Quash.   
      
   8. With the indictment now ruled valid in her court, the   
   Accused could then orient defence and now wanted to be   
   returned to the jurisdiction of the Superior Court for plea   
   pursuant to the previous election for judge and jury entered   
   by Judge Boulet.   
      
   9. Provincial Court has no jurisdiction to try me without plea   
   when my election was entered as "Judge and Jury."   
      
   FOR THESE REASONS, MAY IT PLEASE THE COURT   
      
   GRANT the present Application for Certiorari ordering the   
   removal of the Accused's file from the Provincial Court to the   
   Superior Court for plea and trial by judge and jury.   
      
                                 Quebec ____________________   
                                 Court place, Date   
                                 ________________________________   
                                 Applicant Signature   
      
                          NOTICE OF MOTION   
      
   TAKE NOTICE that on Wednesday Oct 19 2016 at the Courthouse in   
   Quebec City or as soon thereafter can be heard the application   
   made to any judge of this court for the relief claimed.   
      
                                 Quebec ____________________   
                                 Court place, Date   
                                 ________________________________   
                                 Applicant Signature   
   TO: Ministry of Justice   
   TO: The Registrar of the Court   
      
   JCT: Let's see if Superior Court lets the injustice stand when   
   he has a right to be in Superior Court.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)