From: johnturmel@yahoo.com   
      
   JCT: Waylon O'Reilly's grow permit had been stalled 16 weeks   
   so I made him a motion for interim constitutional exemption   
   awaiting processing of his permit to start right away and to   
   grow more plants. Two days after filing, Health Canada   
   processed and mailed his permit.   
      
   But the Judge Roussel dismissed his motion because he should   
   have filed an application to amend the number of plants;   
   except that he hadn't received his permit to try to amend yet.   
   But judge's don't get timelines straight all that often.   
      
   So he sent in an application to amend with a letter demanding   
   the reasons why it takes 16 weeks to process 10 fields of   
   information. He also urged they be as expeditious now as they   
   were after he had filed his motion last time. They have not.   
      
   So Waylon filed another Federal Court Motion for telephonic   
   hearing on Monday morning.   
      
   File No: T-1078-17   
                         FEDERAL COURT   
   BETWEEN:   
                         Waylon O'Reilly   
                                                   Applicant   
                              and   
      
                  Attorney General of Canada   
      
      
        APPLICATION UNDER S.18 OF THE FEDERAL COURT ACT   
      
      
                       NOTICE OF MOTION   
      
      
   TAKE NOTICE THAT on Monday Aug 21 2017, at 10am or as soon   
   thereafter as the motion can be heard, Waylon O'Reilly will   
   make a motion to the Court by teleconference.   
      
   THE MOTION BEFORE THE APPLICATION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW IS   
   FILED IS FOR an Order pending a Judicial Review granting   
   Applicant interim relief of a personal constitutional   
   exemption to allow Applicant to:   
   a) plant 500 outdoor marijuana plants for the 2017 season   
   b) start planting 49 indoor plants according to the expected   
   amended ACMPR exemption he has applied for.   
      
   AND FOR ANY ORDER abridging the time for service or dispensing   
   with any documents or amending any error or omission which   
   this Honourable Court may allow.   
      
   THE GROUNDS FOR THE MOTION ARE that 500 tiny plants for the   
   rest of the outdoor season may yield sufficient crop and that   
   non-instantaneity of delivery of medication by requirement for   
   such a long processing time before growing indoors in an era   
   of instant communications in most other government departments   
   is a violation of the S.7 Charter Right to Life.   
      
   THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE will be used:   
   Applicant' Affidavit dated Aug 16 2017   
   Any other material this court will allow.   
   Dated at Ottawa on Aug 16 2017.   
   Waylon O'Reilly   
      
                  AFFIDAVIT OF WAYLON O'REILLY   
      
   I, Waylon O'Reilly, residing at 8 Cercle Grenier in Grenville,   
   make oath as follows:   
      
   1. On July 10 2017, I filed a motion for an Order granting   
   Applicant interim relief of a personal constitutional   
   exemption to allow Applicant to plant double the outdoor   
   marijuana plants according to his 16-week-awaited ACMPR permit   
   for 19 outdoor plants before the grow season ends pending   
   final processing of Applicant's ACMPR authorization and   
   judicial review.   
      
   2. Ex. 1 is the ACMPR permit registered and mailed out on July   
   12 2017.   
      
   3. Ex. 2 is the July 27 2017 judgment of Madam Justice Roussel   
   dismissing my motion to start planting more plants than my   
   exemption due to the processing delay for not having applied   
   to amend my permit.   
      
   4. Ex. 3 is my Aug 2 2017 letter to Mike McGuire at Health   
   Canada asking for details of the 16-week processing timeline   
   and informing him that pursuant to the decision of Justice   
   Roussel, I was also sending in an application to amend my   
   exemption to allow me to sow 500 plants for the remainder of   
   the 2017 season and amend it from "outdoor" to "outdoor-   
   indoor" and urged similar expedition as after my previous   
   motion was filed.   
      
   5. As I have received no response and hope to avoid another   
   16-week processing time, this Affidavit is made in support of   
   a motion for an Order pending a Judicial Review granting   
   Applicant interim relief of a personal constitutional   
   exemption to allow Applicant to:   
   a) plant 500 outdoor marijuana plants for the 2017 season   
   b) start planting 49 indoor plants according to the expected   
   amended ACMPR exemption he has applied for.   
   Waylon O'Reilly   
   _____________________________________   
   A COMMISSIONER, ETC.   
      
              APPLICANT'S WRITTEN REPRESENTATIONS   
      
   1. On July 10 2017, I filed a motion for an Order granting   
   Applicant interim relief of a personal constitutional   
   exemption to allow Applicant to plant double the outdoor   
   marijuana plants according to his 16-week-awaited ACMPR permit   
   for 19 outdoor plants before the grow season ends pending   
   final processing of Applicant's ACMPR authorization and   
   judicial review.   
      
   2. On July 12 2017, my ACMPR permit was registered and mailed   
   out.   
      
   3. On July 27 2017, Madam Justice Roussel dismissed my motion   
   to start planting more plants than my exemption due to the   
   processing delay for not having applied to amend my permit.   
      
   4. On Aug 2 2017, I wrote a letter to Mike McGuire at Health   
   Canada asking for details of the 16-week processing timeline   
   and informing him that pursuant to the decision of Justice   
   Roussel, I was also sending in an application to amend my   
   exemption to allow me to sow 500 plants for the remainder of   
   the 2017 season and amend it from "outdoor" to "outdoor-   
   indoor" and urged similar expedition as after my previous   
   motion was filed.   
      
   5. I have received no response.   
      
   ISSUE   
      
   6. Are the delays in processing the ACMPR applications for   
   exemption to follow my doctor's prescription a violation my   
   Right to Life?   
      
   ARGUMENT   
      
   7. It would seem evident that such 16- to 20-week processing   
   times to obtain a permit for medication reduces the patient's   
   chances of less pain or even survival in violation of the S.7   
   Charter Right to Life.   
      
   ORDER SOUGHT   
      
   8. Applicant seems an Order pending a Judicial Review granting   
   Applicant interim relief of a personal constitutional   
   exemption to allow Applicant to:   
   a) plant 500 outdoor marijuana plants for the 2017 season   
   b) start planting 49 indoor plants according to the expected   
   amended ACMPR exemption he has applied for.   
   Dated at ________________ on Aug 16 2017.   
   _____________________________________   
   Waylon O'Reilly   
      
   JCT: Waylon has how asked to amend his permit from "outdoor"   
   to "indoor/outdoor." So they stalled his outdoor grow permit   
   until the season was almost over and now they're stalling his   
   indoor permit too.   
      
   The Crown has today to file a response of some kind looking   
   for more delay. Otherwise, they get to explain how his   
   application is doing. Monday should be a fun day.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)