Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    can.legal    |    Debating Canuck legal system quirks    |    10,932 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 10,276 of 10,932    |
|    John KingofthePaupers Turmel to All    |
|    TURMEL: Justice checking change for expi    |
|    27 Sep 17 12:25:13    |
      From: johnturmel@yahoo.com              JCT: Note that after promising process within 6-8 weeks,       Health Canada let Dylan McAmmond's expire. Should he refile       for a new exemption? Here's how Health Canada are covering       that up and how I propose to expose them.              Here are a few recent responses about others who filed within       8 weeks but had their exemptions expire. Keep in mind, they're       supposed to destroy all their plants and stored medicine and       start over when the permit arrives or risk being busted. And I       know a guy who was busted while waiting for his expired       permit's renewal to arrive. So it happened.              Michael MacDonald       My buddy sent in 8 weeks early. It took 11 weeks total. They       back dated his renewal to when the Doctor signed it. This cut       into his time he was already exempt from his first approval a       year ago. So send in early does nothing, they still back date       your paperwork to the day the Doctor signed it.              JCT: And it covered up that they were late and put him on the       horns of the "Destroy or Risk Bust dilemma. Forget being       convicted, just the bust that destroys your grow and loses you       your medicine is death-defying punishment enough.       ---              Kerry O'Grady: Got my renewal in about 10 weeks.       John Turmel: Was it on time? How many weeks beyond their       recommended 6-8 weeks did you send it?       Kerry O'Grady: It was about 3 weeks late. Sent 8 weeks before       expiry.              JCT: So Kerry filed within the recommended time and Health       Canada let it expire and put him on the Horns of Dilemma.              Back to Denise. On Thursday, she filed her Motion for:              1) a personal constitutional exemption to continue growing       marijuana pursuant to the conditions in the expiring ACMPR       permit MCR-3261 until the Health Canada delivers the needed       renewal, or, in the alternative,              2) an extension of Applicant's expiring Exemption; or,              3) an Order of Mandamus that Health Canada immediately do its       duty not to violate Applicant's right to life by allowing the       exemption to expire before the renewal is issued and forcing       Applicant to destroy all plants and stored cannabis.              Ministry of Justice calls Health Canada to say they have a       Statement of Claim they have to deal with and ask if there's       any reason they haven't yet renewed her exemption.              HC says no particular reason other than we're late on almost       everyone. Justice says maybe not to be late on this one. So HC       bumps Denise to the top of the pile and she's issued the next       day. It's mailed out. But that will take time and there's the       motion coming up on Wednesday.              So Crown Kevin Palframan called the Court and then Ray to       organize an abandonment of the motion hearing. No problem, Ray       would consent. So Palframan went in this morning to tell the       Court that the exemption had been issued and mailed and that       Denise consented to abandonment of the motion. He indicated       that though she didn't yet have her new exemption, it was       officially on the computer and (get this) if there was a       problem, Respondent consented to the Court extending the       exemption until it arrived. Our Remedy #2.              What's great is that it establishes that they cede that the       Court extending the exemption is a valid remedy. Might not       even need to ask for a court-granted exemption since another       accepted line of relief always takes precedence over the court       having to do it in an extraordinary way.              And while discussing how he'll sign the consent form when it       arrived, Ray pointed out that Denise's exemption expiring on       Sep 29 was only being renewed to June 26 2018, a year after       the doctor signed the renewal form, not a year after expiry       like under the old MMAR.              So Ray put the Crown on the spot. Go find out who changed the       renewed expiry date from the regular yearly date to the       variable doctor signed date?              Someone had to change that policy. Under the MMAR, your       exemption expired on the same date all the time. Now, by only       extending it to a year after the doctor signed causes part of       this year's permit to be wasted. In effect, 33% more doctor       visits if 25% of permit is duplicated. Effectively, every       permit is for only 9 months and each year, the expiry date       gets advanced by the loss.              Worse, Colleen Harris is suing for the value of her       prescription past the MMAR's 4-week time for processing. They       took 28 weeks. If she sends in her renewal 12 weeks early, not       trusting their 6-8 week misdirection, she's only left with 12       weeks worth of a year's exemption! 3/4 of her year of       exemption is gone!              Have to give credit to Trudeau, not even sleazebag Harper       could have found a way to harm patients by cutting effective       time of exemption to maximize doctor costs.              As for the fools who fell for Reneger Trudeau #2, Pierre       reneged too, what he calls legalization will still have:       Cops versus Gardeners and Kids. All to hinder competition for       his corporate sponsors.              Remember, over 100K of Justin's Busteds after Reneger #2 got       elected to keep cops and lawyers busy. And it's not going to       stop. Trudeau is a family of Renegers. Sadly, he's an idiot,       believes it's warmer than when Greenland was green and vaccine       combinations are tested and safe. No problem with fluoride       either, says drop-out engineering failure.              But Health Canada is now on the spot. If they don't tell       Justice who changed the date rules, Ray won't get Denise to       sign the Consent and Kevin will have to swear out an affidavit       that Ray told he would to explain why he told the court so and       hasn't produced the Consent. They Ray gets to go in and make a       stink about the date and who changed the rules before ceding       he had agreed and would now consent.              So we're on the hunt for the sumbitch who changed the rules to       short-change all those new applications by all the months they       managed to stall processing and then the months spent       processing the 1st renewal, Colleen the optimal example.              And who costs every renewal after that to lose the time       duplicated by the process period. Basically, moving the expiry       date ahead every time. Wonder if Trudeau dreamed that up       himself or if the guy who dreamed up letting LPs cancel       permits for a business reason and then not letting LPs return       the medical documents so they can go to another LP. Sounds       like the same evil gremlin again.              But we're on the trail. The old MMAR was year to year with       renewals not advancing expiry dates. Who changed it so       renewals would advance expiry dates and short change the       patients with more necessary medical documents.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca