From: johnturmel@yahoo.com   
      
   JCT: Someone at Health Canada decided to jerk Art Jackes   
   around twice rejecting his application to amend his permit for   
   signatures deemed not to be original!!! Ball-point pens!   
      
   So I prepared a Statement of Claim for a declaration that such   
   rejection violates his rights and tomorrow, he'll file a   
   Motion for interim relief to move his grow right away.   
      
   File No: T-1654-17   
                           FEDERAL COURT   
   Between:   
                           ARTHUR JACKES   
      
                                                Plaintiff   
                                AND   
                       Her Majesty The Queen   
                                                Defendant   
      
                         STATEMENT OF CLAIM   
            (Pursuant to S.48 of the Federal Court Act)   
      
   FACTS   
      
   1. The Plaintiff seeks a declaration that delaying his   
   application to amend Plaintiff's ACMPR permit Number MCR:   
   16335 for over 13 weeks by rejecting the originality of   
   signatures in black ink and suggesting a new application be   
   signed in blue ink when Licensed Producer Security Clearance   
   Applicants are prohibited from using blue ink is an   
   unconstitutional violation of the patient's S.7 Right to Life.   
      
   THE PARTIES   
      
   2. The Plaintiff is a person Possessing an ACMPR Production   
   Permit Number MCR-16355.   
   3. The Defendant, Her Majesty the Queen in Right of   
   Canada, as represented by the Attorney General of Canada,   
   is named as the representative of the Federal Government   
   of Canada and the Minister of Health for Canada who is   
   the Minister responsible for Health Canada and certain   
   aspects of the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act   
   including the Narcotic Control Regulations and the ACMPR.   
      
   BACKGROUND   
      
   4. On July 24, 2017, Plaintiff's Application to Amend his   
   ACMPR permit to move his garden to a new site and register his   
   Care-Giver as the Responsible Person to help him grow cannabis   
   for medical purposes was received by Health Canada.   
      
   5. On Aug 22, 2017, Health Canada mailed back rejecting the   
   application for want of original signatures.   
      
   6. The same day, Plaintiff mailed back his Application with a   
   note beside each signature indicating it was original and a   
   letter informing them he knew all pages had to be original.   
      
   7. On Oct 19, 2017, Health Canada again rejected his   
   application with a letter stating:   
       Health Canada received and screened your application   
       package to register for personal use or designated   
       production under the Access to Cannabis for Medical   
       Purposes Regulations (ACMPR). Your application package was   
       found to be incomplete in the areas identified in the list   
       below. We are returning, with this letter, your   
       registration form and all supporting documents you   
       provided with your form:   
       Section 3 Responsible Person - Signature must be original   
       Annex A   
       Section A2: Production Site Owner's Consent - Signature   
       must be original   
       Comments:   
       All the documents you submitted to Health Canada were   
       returned with this letter and no physical record was kept   
       by Health Canada. Should you wish to register, you will   
       need to submit a revised registration form and the   
       required supporting documents.   
      
       Section 2 Application Information   
       Additional Comments:   
       As discussed by phone on October 19 and 20, the   
       application that has been submitted is inadmissible as the   
       signatures in Section 3 and Section 2 have been deemed to   
       not be original. Applicant has been informed that   
       submission of a new application would result in the   
       application being treated at a higher priority. Applicant   
       was informed that, while not mandatory, it is our   
       recommendation he use a blue ball-point pen when filling   
       out the application to minimize disagreement as to the   
       veracity of the signatures. As acknowledgment of the   
       expense of postage, a pre-paid envelope has been attached   
       to be used for submission of the medical document and   
       newly-filled application form.   
      
   8. The Instructions for Completion of Security Clearance Form   
   Under the Access to Cannabis for Medical Purposes Regulations   
   (ACMPR) makes it mandatory not to use blue ink:   
       1.2 This form is to be completed using an automated system   
       or printed in block letter format in black ink.   
      
   9. Jeff and Colleen Harris both had their applications   
   accepted in black ink.   
      
   10. Plaintiff is presently complying to get his new   
   application signed in blue ink and retains the original   
   application.   
      
   The Plaintiff proposes this action be tried in the   
   City of Toronto, Province of Ontario.   
      
      
   Dated at Oakville on Oct 31 2017.   
   Plaintiff   
   Arthur Jackes   
      
   JCT: After adding the File No to his Record of Motion,   
   tomorrow, he files for a hearing for interim relief for next   
   Tuesday.   
      
                          NOTICE OF MOTION   
      
   TAKE NOTICE THAT on Tues Nov 7 2017, at 9:30am, the   
   Applicant will make a motion to the Court General Sittings on   
   short notice if necessary at the Federal Courthouse in   
   Toronto.   
      
   THE MOTION IS FOR an Order granting Applicant interim relief:   
      
   1) a personal constitutional exemption to continue growing   
   marijuana pursuant to the amended conditions for the ACMPR   
   permit MCR-16355 until processing of the second application in   
   blue ink by the Health Canada is complete; or, alternatively,   
      
   2) an amendment of Applicant's Exemption.   
      
   THE GROUNDS FOR THE MOTION ARE that insisting Applicants for   
   Security Clearances sign in black ink while rejecting the   
   originality of Plaintiff's original signatures in black ink   
   and demanding a new application signed in blue ink is an   
   arbitrary and irrational violation of Plaintiff's S.7 Charter   
   Right to Life.   
      
   AND FOR ANY ORDER abridging the time for service or amending   
   any error or omission which this Honourable Court may allow.   
      
   THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE will be used at the   
   hearing of the motion: Applicant's Affidavit.   
      
                     AFFIDAVIT OF ARTHUR JACKES   
      
   1. Ex. A is a copy of the Application to Amend Plaintiff's   
   ACMPR permit MCR-16355 which was twice rejected.   
      
   2. Ex. B dated Aug 22, 2017 is the Health Canada response   
   rejecting my application for want of original signatures.   
      
   3. Ex. C dated Aug 22 2017 is my letter explaining I knew all   
   pages had to be original with a note beside each signature   
   indicating it was original.   
      
   4. Ex. D dated Oct 19, 2017 is the Health Canada response   
   again rejecting my application with a letter stating:   
       Health Canada received and screened your application   
       package to register for personal use or designated   
       production under the Access to Cannabis for Medical   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)