Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    can.legal    |    Debating Canuck legal system quirks    |    10,932 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 10,311 of 10,932    |
|    John KingofthePaupers Turmel to All    |
|    TURMEL: Judge hears Paquette short notic    |
|    18 Dec 17 18:29:51    |
      From: johnturmel@yahoo.com              JCT: Last Friday, Luc Paquette tried to file a motion to       vary Recognizance to get his bail money back. We learned       that the Recognizance form was wrong to tell us a JP or       Provincial Judge could vary a condition. But that's only       with Crown consent. Without consent, we should have gone to       Superior Court.              So the Court name was changed and on Monday, Ray and Luc       went in to get his new Recognizance without the curfew until       Jan 3 and then to file for relief in Superior Court.              The clerk said with the shortage of Superior Court judges,       there were no near dates available. Ray pointed out on even       the new Recognizance that he'd just signed still had the       wrong information that made him waste time below. So could       she go show it to judge and see what he could do?              She came back and said that a Superior Court judge had       granted the motion for a short notice hearing tomorrow       morning! Technically, the judge can't do that but remember       how all our motions include the magic words:              AND FOR ANY ORDER abridging or extending the time for       service and filing...              If that were not there asking him for a short notice hearing       if that's what it takes, it's doubtful he'd have granted it       on his own. Maybe. Except that the rules say you have to       give the Crown sufficient service, usually 3 clear days.       They didn't get it so that rule had to be ignored and short       notice granted.              Good sign. Looks to me the simplicity of the situation got       the judge's attention. It shouldn't take more than 10       minutes.              And it lets the Crown know that they'd better come up with       one heck of a good reason why bail rather than bond is       needed to compel his attendance.              If it had to bet, I'd say this one is a 90%! 9:1 odds I'd       give. Every time I can remember where a judge has granted       short notice hearing, it's because they were swayed by the       argument.              Luc gets his hearing a day after he files his motion.       Ray got his medpot renewal hearing 5 hours after he filed       his motion and his permit 5 hours later.              So it would seem we'll have a Superior Court Justice playing       Santa for at least one non-mob-king-pin grower's family.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca