Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    can.legal    |    Debating Canuck legal system quirks    |    10,932 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 10,346 of 10,932    |
|    John KingofthePaupers Turmel to All    |
|    TURMEL: Blew deadline, asking Judge Brow    |
|    06 Feb 18 15:33:11    |
      From: johnturmel@yahoo.com              TURMEL: Blew deadline, asking Judge Brown for extension of time              JCT: At today's case management hearing for Art Jackes'       claim that they cost him time by improperly rejecting his       black-ink original as not original, Judge Brown informed       Jeff that we'd missed the deadline for filing a response to       the Crown's motion to dismiss.              Darned, I checked, and yes, his Order said that that the       Plaintiff had until Feb 5 to file and the Defendant had       until Feb 12 to Reply.              Somehow, since we're defending against their motion to       dismiss, I forgot we weren't the Defendant but the       Plaintiff. So we're late. Usually, not a problem. But we       have to file a motion for an extension of time.              In this discussion of time is the need for the Crown to make       a motion to dismiss the second "time back" cause of action       by the newbies to which we respond.              I wanted Jeff to suggest that either they amend their Motion       to include #2 and then we respond; or they file a       supplementary motion to dismiss #2 and we file a       supplementary response. That remains undecided!              As well, Jeff asked to adopt the amendments in the newbie       Statements of Claim. Luc got 2 newbies signed up today just       in time for Jeff to be able to mention that the fixed claim       was now before the court. But he has to move to adopt it for       the group. Sure.              Here's the problem. Not only did we wait for the wrong date       but we were waiting in order to get the CD of the Terry       Johnsgaard hearing where there were a bunch of goodies that       need to be cited. And we're still waiting. I'd asked Jeff to       ask to have our response put off until we get the CD but       having missed the deadline, we'll ask for the extension to       ensure we have the CD before our response is due.              Here's the problem. If Terry had just said: Send me the CD,       I want it, he had asked about putting it up at his web site       for others to listen to. That takes the okay of the judge to       broadcast such hearing. So it must have been routed toward       the judge for a decision and they didn't bother sending him       the CD until that okay is ascertained though he can have the       CD and be prohibited from uploading it.              So Jeff ordered the darned thing too. Doesn't want it for       his web site, only to listen to it, and pass it to friends.              So I'll prepare the Motion seeking until after the CD to       file if the Crown doesn't amend their motion to dismiss.              The Crown informed the Court that there are now over 50       Turmel Kit Plaintiffs on file. Many I don't know of but Jeff       has asked for their email contacts.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca