From: johnturmel@yahoo.com   
      
   JCT: On Tuesday, I was in North Bay to be an expert witness   
   in the Mathematics of Gambling to attest that all the regime   
   flaws raised in the Mike Ethier's Charter Motion reduce the   
   chances of patient survival.   
      
   Judge John D. Keast gave me plenty of time to explain how I   
   laid out how the chances are reduced and then patient   
   witnesses can lay out how much it hurt. The whole argument.   
      
   And then he ruled that he didn't see the relevance of my   
   testimony.   
      
   No problem, all the harms are laid out in the Constitutional   
   Motion itself, even without my report, and he has to sign   
   off on "nothing wrong here." And then we take it and the   
   previous dismissal of the Quash motion by another judge to   
   appeal.   
      
   As for driving impaired by marijuana, the cop testified he   
   followed Mike for 30km and saw him crossing the center line   
   and even the shoulder of the road.   
      
   You'd think he'd have pulled over such a danger to the road   
   in the first kilometer. Why wait 30 kilometers. And haven't   
   you crossed the center line the odd time on an empty   
   highway?   
      
   Regardless, Mike's been smoking and driving all his life and   
   has never caused an accident. How is that possible if he   
   always drove as dangerously as the cop painted it?   
      
   I told Mike his strongest card was that no matter what the   
   cop thought he saw, his driving has never ever caused an   
   accident.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)