home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   can.legal      Debating Canuck legal system quirks      10,932 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 10,367 of 10,932   
   John KingofthePaupers Turmel to All   
   TURMEL: Two more Lapierre Plaintiffs fil   
   28 Feb 18 13:55:56   
   
   From: johnturmel@yahoo.com   
      
   TURMEL: Two more Lapierre Plaintiffs file for interim grow permits   
      
   JCT: Two more of Luc Lapierre's Plaintiffs didn't get their   
   permits in 1 and 2 weeks waiting and have filed motions for   
   interim remedy. Boy, are Health Canada suckers for   
   punishment.   
      
   Jonathan Courcelles filed his Statement of Claim T-327-18   
   that his registration is taking too long on Feb 16. He gave   
   them almost 2 weeks to hop to it. They did not. So he filed   
   his Motion for Interim Remedy on Feb 27.   
      
   Charline Pelissier filed her Statement of Claim T-343-18   
   on Feb 20. She gave them a week to hop to it. They did not.   
   So she filed her Motion for Interim Remedy on Feb 27.   
      
   Oral directions received from the Court:   
   The Honourable Mr. Justice Brown dated 27-FEB-2018 directing   
   that:   
       Further to the Plaintiff's motion record, filed on   
       February 27, 2018, The Defendant has until March 9,   
       2018, to serve and file responding material.   
      
   JCT: So now the Crown has to get them their permits before   
   March 9 to mooten their motions. But they're still going to   
   have file an response explaining that they have complied.   
   Har har har.   
      
   So, three newbies on Judge Brown's desk this week thanks to   
   Luc Lapierre's great big mouth! the judge still has to deal   
   with the Crown demanding costs for Heidi's successful   
   motion, and tomorrow has a hearing with Jeff Harris at   
   3:00pm on the timetable for the documents on the action.   
   That's where the Crown forgot the judge has to extend the   
   time, not them, and forgot to give us a chance to respond to   
   their motion to dismiss the "back-dated time" claim with   
   their already-filed motion to dismiss the "too-long time"   
   claim which we are prepared to answer when the judge says   
   okay.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca