Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    can.legal    |    Debating Canuck legal system quirks    |    10,932 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 10,417 of 10,932    |
|    John KingofthePaupers Turmel to All    |
|    TURMEL: Donald Cote finally gets hop-to-    |
|    03 May 18 04:41:01    |
      From: johnturmel@gmail.com              TURMEL: Donald Cote finally gets hop-to-it grow permit              JCT: Double cancer patient Donald Cote had filed a Statement       of Claim about being refused his permit because they allege       the original signatures were not original. Where have we       heard that before.              Then, after 8 months, they tell him that the "not-original"       signature from his Chiropractor was no good because chiros       can't prescribe drugs. 8 months to tell him to start over.       Remember, he'd asked Judge Brown to order them to expedite       his application once he got the proper doctor. Sadly, he       didn't think he had to. Guess he didn't think they'd stall       him again.              They did. After filing an application from a proper doctor,       he waited waited 4 weeks then filed another Statement of       Claim on April 10.              After no result in 10 days, (probably still in the mail-room       with the other 60,000 and couldn't be found so fast) he       filed a Motion to see Judge Brown on April 20.              Court Number : T-684-18       Style of Cause : DONALD CgT? v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN              - 2018-04-23 Ottawa Oral directions received from the Court:       The Honourable Mr. Justice Brown dated 20-APR-2018 directing       that        "Defendant to file responding material on or before May        2, 2018, Applicant to file reply on or before May 9,        2018."              JCT: The day before their May 2 Response was due, Defendant       asked for an extension of time:              - 2018-05-01 Ottawa Letter from Defendant dated 01-MAY-2018       advising that there is a mistake in the affidavit of the       Applicant's motion record (docs. 3-6) and requesting an       extension of time to file its responding motion record       ***scanned to Justice Brown*** received on 01-MAY-2018              JCT: Maybe they hadn't found his application in the mail-       room yet. Fine, some mistake in Donald's Affidavit they say,       we'll find out what soon enough.              Department of Justice       May 2 2018              JCT: Looks like they must have found it in the mail room.              WW:Donald Cote              Dear Sir:        Re: Cote, Donald v. HMQ (Turmel kit) T-684-18              WW:I am advised by Health Canada that it has approved your       application for registration to produce cannabis for your       personal medical use, and that your registration is       currently valid. I am also advised that a cerfificate       confirming this registration was signed May 1 2018 and has       been sent to you via registered mail and will arrive       shortly.              JCT: At least they're not sending it snail-mail.              WW: Your motion for interim relief is now moot. In light of       this, I ask that you abandon your motion by completing the       enclosed Notice of Abandonment. If you wish to discontinue       your underlying claim, please also complete the enclosed       Notice of Discontinuance.              JCT: No one wants to discontinue their underlying claim for       damages over the delay but one of our Plaintiffs fell for it       and submitted both notices and lost her claim for damages.       Now, no one submits either form. It forces them to file a       Motion in Response explaining why it took so long and how it       is now mooted. Why let them get away without explaining?              WW: Once completed, please serve and file these or provide       me with electronic copies for filing on your behalf. I ask       that you file or return the Notice of Abandonment by May 4       at 5pm.       Yours truly, Wendy Wright.       Counsel, National Litigation Sector              JCT: Early on, I okayed people abandoning their motions once       they'd received their permits but then decided I didn't want       them avoiding having to explain all the facts of why they       took so long. That's when we find out how many were       originally refused for non-original signatures as the first       stall.              Soon, we'll get to hear their explanation for why it wasn't       expedited, even if delayed! They can't say it was buried       somewhere in the mail room.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca