home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   can.legal      Debating Canuck legal system quirks      10,932 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 10,418 of 10,932   
   John KingofthePaupers Turmel to All   
   TURMEL: Kent Truman's Claim for timeback   
   07 May 18 11:06:40   
   
   From: johnturmel@gmail.com   
      
   JCT: The Crown has argued that our Plaintiffs' Cause of   
   Action B, permit too short, was mooted by the S.56 orders   
   that make it so no one registering after March 2 2018 will   
   be short-changed. Except, we now have a case of a guy who is   
   proof-positive that his registration before March 2 has not   
   been extended to moot the claim. Before we reply to the   
   Crown's argument that his problem has been solved. Har har   
   har har har har. Like catching a card in the guts for the   
   nut straight.   
      
   T-849-18   
                          FEDERAL COURT   
   BETWEEN:   
                       Kent Wilfred Truman   
                                                   Applicant   
                               and   
                    Attorney General of Canada   
                                                  Respondent   
      
   TAKE NOTICE THAT on May 8 2018, the Applicant will make a   
   short notice motion by telephone with leave of the court if   
   necessary.   
      
   THE MOTION IS FOR an Order granting Applicant interim relief   
   in:   
      
   A) documentation that the Mar 2 2018 S.56 Class Exemption   
   has mooted my need to have my Registration extended until   
   Sep 5 2018   
      
   B1) a personal constitutional exemption to continue growing   
   marijuana pursuant to the conditions in the ACMPR   
   Registration MCR-44452 until the Health Canada delivers the   
   needed renewal, or, in the alternative,   
      
   B2) an extension of Applicant's expiring Exemption; or,   
      
   B3) an Order of Mandamus that Health Canada immediately do   
   its duty to process the renewal before the permit expires.   
      
   JCT: It was lovely to be able to put the Crown on the spot   
   to produce S.56 Order that moots his short-changed permit. I   
   know it's not there and that what is there only helps   
   newbies but Wendy said it mooted the need of the oldies and   
   now she has to prove it before we have to respond.   
      
   And since his permit expires tomorrow, I'd expect Judge   
   Brown to do the same as in the past and give Wendy until   
   noon to respond for an afternoon hearing tomorrow.   
      
                      APPLICANT'S AFFIDAVIT   
      
   I, Kent Wilfred Truman, residing in York, Ontario make oath   
   and say as follows:   
      
   1. On Sep 5 2017, Health Canada issued Registration MCR-   
   44452 to produce my cannabis which expires on May 5 2018.   
      
   JCT: Oops, it expires on May 8 2018, typo.   
      
   2. After reading about a S.56 Class Exemption to mooten the   
   claims of Plaintiffs seeking their full-term, I called   
   Health Canada and was told my Registration was extended by   
   the 4 months I had lost to Sep 5 2018. I did not receive an   
   updated certificate of registration.   
      
   3. On April 9 2018, 5 months in advance of my undocumented   
   Sep 5 expiry date and 1 month before expiry of my May 8   
   registration certificate, I submitted my renewal. I have not   
   yet received my renewed registration.   
      
   4. On May 5, I learned that despite the Health Canada having   
   told the Court that the problem of short-changed plaintiffs   
   had been mooted by a S.56 Class Exemption that would no   
   longer short anyone after March 2, actually, the S.56 Class   
   Exemption for those registering after March 2 had not   
   extended the exemptions of anyone registered before Mar 2.   
      
   5. On May 8 2018, my registration expires and my Designated   
   Person must destroy my plantation and stored cannabis.   
      
   JCT: Glad the typo gets corrected here.   
      
                     WRITTEN REPRESENTATIONS   
      
   1. Applicant is an ACMPR exemptee to use marijuana for   
   medical purposes number MCR-44452 with expiry on May 8 2018   
   who submitted a renewal on April 9 2018 and has not yet   
   received it.   
      
   2. The Health Canada Renewal instruction page states:   
        It is recommended to submit your renewal application at   
        least 6-8 weeks before the expiry of your current   
        registration certificate.   
      
   3. At a hearing before this Court in Raymond Turmel v. HMQ   
   T-977-13, Justice Roy was informed that Dr. Stephane   
   Lessard, Controlled Substances and Tobacco Directorate had   
   said: "Most Exemptions are done in under 4 weeks, and   
   renewals, far less.'   
      
   4. Under the ACMPR, with only production Registrations to   
   deal with, that time has been raised up to 11 months for   
   applications and 16 for renewals. And though the Renewal   
   Information Page suggests submitting renewals 6-8 weeks   
   before expiry, it does not mention it will be renewed 6-8   
   weeks after expiry due to short staff swamped by many   
   applications. Lead Plaintiff Jeff Harris T-1379-17 was   
   renewed under the MMAR in 2 weeks. What's to check?   
      
   5. The only reason this application is on short notice is   
   that Applicant was informed by Health Canada that his permit   
   had been extended by the S.56 Class Exemption used to mooten   
   the claims of other Plaintiffs seeking the full-term of   
   their prescriptions. He has not received an updated   
   certificate.   
      
   6. With 5 months before supposed expiry, but only 1 month   
   before actual expiry, Applicant submitted his renewal in   
   seeming plenty of time.   
      
   7. It would seem that the S.56 exemption does not extend his   
   permit to mooten the claims of plaintiffs for full terms.   
   Applicant faces devastating consequences by the failure of   
   the S.56 Class Exemption to mooten his predicament.   
      
   JCT: Serendipity to have this expiring permit land in my   
   hand just after the Crown misled the court into thinking   
   that the S.56 Class Exemptions settled the claims of   
   our Plaintiffs. Har har har har har har.   
      
   Stay tuned. I doubt Justice Brown will let it expire without   
   Wendy explaining how they've solved his problem. And it was   
   a great chance to make her produce the S.56 Class Exemptions   
   she hasn't had to produce so far.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca