From: johnturmel@gmail.com   
      
   JCT: I noticed that the Crown's Motion to Strike our claims   
   for damages due to delay did not use the Amended Statement   
   of Claim the Court had allowed with the Cause of Action B   
   over back-dating permits but instead used an older not-   
   amended claim to hide the fact that we had asked!   
      
   Since Wendy missed her chance to fix her mistake, we had to   
   let the judge know he was going to have to fixed it for her:   
      
   Dear Ms. Martin:   
      
   1. On May 1 2018, I emailed you that the Applicant's Motion   
   Record to strike the March 5 2018 Amended Statement of Claim   
   of Lead Plaintiff Allan J. Harris did not include that March   
   5 2018 Amended Statement of Claim. The Record of Motion to   
   strike a claim should contain that claim being struck so I   
   consented to the right claim being substituted.   
      
   2. You wrote back with copy to Wendy Wright:   
       Please contact Wendy Wright about the error and she can   
       advise the Court of her mistake. Thanks!   
      
   3. Wendy Wright explained why the wrong document was used:   
       I included a copy of a different Statement of Claim from   
       another Plaintiff in my record as it contained a   
       statement about how long renewals were supposed to take.   
      
   4. The Jason Allman Statement of Claim was over a delayed   
   permit renewal while the Harris Statement of Claim was over   
   a delayed permit. The Written Representations cite no   
   details on renewal delays from the Allman claim and all the   
   details cited on my registration delays are not in the   
   Allman Statement of Claim.   
      
   5. In Applicant's Written Representations are references to   
   the Amended Statement of Claim omitted from the Motion   
   Record:   
       21. The plaintiff in the present claim, Allan J. Harris,   
       filed his original Statement of Claim on September   
       11,2017, and an Amended Statement of Claim on March   
       5,2018.   
       22. According to his amended claim...   
      
   7. Written Representations also refer to other causes of   
   action not in the Motion Record:   
       23. The plaintiff now seeks declarations...   
      
   8. The Allman Claim does not "seek declarations" but seeks   
   only one declaration for Cause of Action A, as does the   
   original claim of the Lead Plaintiff, and no declaration for   
   Cause of Action B.   
      
   9. But the Written Representations do refer to Cause of   
   Action B not present in the Allman Claim:   
       24. With respect to the registration expiry date of   
       March 23, 2018, the plaintiff also seeks a further   
       declaration that the "back-dating" of his registration   
       to the date that his health care practitioner signed his   
       medical document also violates s. 7, and a "remedy for   
       the full term of the prescription to take effect on the   
       Effective Date of the Registration."   
      
   6. The Statements of Claim of all the 140 Plaintiffs are   
   deemed amended to that of the Lead Plaintiff which was   
   updated to include both Causes of Action: A: too long   
   process time, B: too short permit. The Amended Statement of   
   Claim was granted because any rulings on it will influence   
   the claims of other Plaintiffs and therefore, the updated   
   Amended Statement of Claim being referred to in the Motion   
   should be the claim in the Motion Record rather than an   
   outdated Statement of Claim not referred to at all.   
      
   10. After a March 2 2018 S.56 Class Exemption reset the   
   start of the exemption period to the Date of Issuance to   
   mooten the declaration of unconstitutionality sought herein,   
   relying on an outdated claim that is missing the claim for   
   Remedy B would only serve to hide that someone had sought   
   the remedy received.   
      
   DIRECTION SOUGHT   
      
   11. With an error only becoming a mistake when it remains   
   uncorrected, I would ask the Case Management Judge for a   
   Direction:   
      
   a) dismissing the Applicant's motion to strike the wrong   
   outdated Statement of Claim as moot; or   
      
   b) ordering that the Defendant replace the out-dated not-   
   amended Statement of Claim of Jason Allman with the updated   
   Mar 5 2018 Amended Statement of Claim on page 33 of the   
   Motion Record to strike the March 5 Amended Statement of   
   Claim.   
   Dated at Burnaby on May 5 2018.   
   Jeff Harris   
      
   JCT: So let's see what happens.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)